Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies a novel form of quantum nonclassicality arising from the synthesis of observational and interventional data within causal inference frameworks. The study demonstrates that while individual datasets may admit classical explanations, their joint consideration can violate single classical models, offering new insights into the limits of classical causality in quantum systems. This work advances fundamental understanding of how quantum mechanics challenges traditional causal structures through data fusion paradigms.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Quantum nonclassicality from causal data fusion

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2405.19252v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bell's theorem can be understood as establishing the incompatibility of quantum correlations with any classical causal explanation. Causal inference, however, relies not only on passive observations but also on interventions. Here we ask when the observational and interventional data collected on a given causal structure can all be reproduced by a single classical causal model, which is a particular instance of the data fusion problem in causal inference [Bareinboim and Pearl, PNAS 113, 7345 (2016)]. We show that quantum systems give rise to a new form of nonclassicality in this setting, namely: when the data tables associated with each (non)intervention paradigm admit classical explanations, but no single classical model explains the different intervention paradigms when considered jointly. We call this nonclassicality in the synthesis of the data fusion. We assess the prevalence of such fusion by partitioning all marginalized causal structures over three observed variables into exactly two categories: those which can and those which cannot exhibit such nonclassicality. For all those that can, we present explicit quantum violations of the associated causal inequalities.

Abstract:Bell's theorem can be understood as establishing the incompatibility of quantum correlations with any classical causal explanation. Causal inference, however, relies not only on passive observations but also on interventions. Here we ask when the observational and interventional data collected on a given causal structure can all be reproduced by a single classical causal model, which is a particular instance of the data fusion problem in causal inference [Bareinboim and Pearl, PNAS 113, 7345 (2016)]. We show that quantum systems give rise to a new form of nonclassicality in this setting, namely: when the data tables associated with each (non)intervention paradigm admit classical explanations, but no single classical model explains the different intervention paradigms when considered jointly. We call this nonclassicality in the synthesis of the data fusion. We assess the prevalence of such fusion by partitioning all marginalized causal structures over three observed variables into exactly two categories: those which can and those which cannot exhibit such nonclassicality. For all those that can, we present explicit quantum violations of the associated causal inequalities.

21 pages, 19 figures. v2: substantially revised and expanded; incorporates and supersedes arXiv:2405.19278, which is withdrawn

arXiv:2405.19252 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2405.19252v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.19252 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words

Related coverage