Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper resolves the long-standing debate over whether complex numbers are fundamental to quantum mechanics by demonstrating that real-number formulations can consistently reproduce all multipartite experimental predictions under a specific postulate regarding composite systems. The authors conclude that while complex numbers remain mathematically convenient, they do not hold an ontological necessity for describing physical reality in this framework.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Computing Report
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Quantum mechanics based on real numbers: A consistent description

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2503.17307v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Complex numbers play a crucial role in quantum mechanics. However, their necessity remains debated: whether they are fundamental or merely convenient. Recently, it was shown that any real-number quantum theory satisfying certain postulates can be falsified with multipartite experiments. In this Letter we show that a physically motivated postulate about composite quantum systems allows us to construct quantum mechanics based on real numbers that reproduces predictions for all multipartite quantum experiments. Thus, we argue that real-valued quantum mechanics cannot be falsified, and therefore the use of complex numbers is a matter of convenience.

Abstract:Complex numbers play a crucial role in quantum mechanics. However, their necessity remains debated: whether they are fundamental or merely convenient. Recently, it was shown that any real-number quantum theory satisfying certain postulates can be falsified with multipartite experiments. In this Letter we show that a physically motivated postulate about composite quantum systems allows us to construct quantum mechanics based on real numbers that reproduces predictions for all multipartite quantum experiments. Thus, we argue that real-valued quantum mechanics cannot be falsified, and therefore the use of complex numbers is a matter of convenience.

arXiv:2503.17307 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2503.17307v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.17307 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 240202, June 18, 2026

https://doi.org/10.1103/4k13-sdjh Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 200 words

Related coverage