aiqbench analysis
This study investigates the relationship between entangling circuit topologies and performance in variational quantum classifiers applied to breast cancer diagnosis, finding that richer connectivity improves accuracy but does not establish a definitive causal link to entanglement metrics alone. The results highlight the complex interplay between circuit expressivity and entanglement structure, offering nuanced insights for researchers optimizing quantum algorithms on near-term hardware.
Quantum Entanglement in Variational Quantum Classification for Breast Cancer Diagnosis
arXiv:2609.34617v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This study looks at how the entangling structure of a variational quantum classifier (VQC) relates to its performance in breast cancer diagnosis, using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset. We tested three three-qubit configurations that share the same EfficientSU2 ansatz, COBYLA optimizer, and stratified five-fold cross-validation, but differ in their entangling structure: a single- repetition Ising-type coupling (A), a two-repetition linear Ising-type coupling (B), and a fully connected Heisenberg-type coupling (C). Entanglement was measured with the von Neumann entropy and the Wootters concurrence. From A to C, the mean entropy rose from 0.40 to 0.71, accuracy rose from 92.98% to 93.68%, and F1-score rose from 90.32% to 91.28%. Configuration C was also the most stable across folds. However, the fold-level correlations between entanglement and performance were weak and not significant. Richer topologies also increase circuit expressivity, so the two effects cannot be fully separated. These results show an association, not a proven causal link, between entangling structure and VQC performance.
Abstract:This study looks at how the entangling structure of a variational quantum classifier (VQC) relates to its performance in breast cancer diagnosis, using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset. We tested three three-qubit configurations that share the same EfficientSU2 ansatz, COBYLA optimizer, and stratified five-fold cross-validation, but differ in their entangling structure: a single- repetition Ising-type coupling (A), a two-repetition linear Ising-type coupling (B), and a fully connected Heisenberg-type coupling (C). Entanglement was measured with the von Neumann entropy and the Wootters concurrence. From A to C, the mean entropy rose from 0.40 to 0.71, accuracy rose from 92.98% to 93.68%, and F1-score rose from 90.32% to 91.28%. Configuration C was also the most stable across folds. However, the fold-level correlations between entanglement and performance were weak and not significant. Richer topologies also increase circuit expressivity, so the two effects cannot be fully separated. These results show an association, not a proven causal link, between entangling structure and VQC performance.
arXiv:2609.34617 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.34617v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34617 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words
Related coverage

From Scan to Treatment Plan, AI Helps Close Breast Cancer’s Deadliest Gaps
NVIDIA · Oct 5, 2026
Resource-Efficient Variational Quantum Classifier
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026

NVIDIA Inception startups tackle gaps in breast cancer care
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 6, 2026
Comparative Study of Quantum and Classical Machine Learning Models in Binary Classification
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026