aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates a fundamental trade-off in quantum thermodynamics, showing that optimizing an interacting spin system for energy storage capacity inherently reduces its efficiency as a heat engine. The research highlights how specific microscopic interactions, such as dipolar coupling, can be tuned to prioritize either battery performance or work extraction within the same physical platform. These findings are critical for researchers designing hybrid quantum devices that must balance competing energetic requirements without relying on classical approximations.
Quantum Energy Storage versus Heat-to-Work Conversion in an Interacting Spin System
arXiv:2608.19533v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate the energetic and thermodynamic performance of an interacting two-qubit system serving as both a quantum battery and a quantum Otto heat engine. The working medium is described by an anisotropic Heisenberg Hamiltonian supplemented by a dipolar interaction, a symmetric spin--orbit interaction, and an external magnetic field. Within a unified microscopic framework, we first analyze a coherent unitary charging protocol and characterize the resulting energy-storage performance through the ergotropy, anti-ergotropy, charging power, storage capacity, and $\ell_1$-norm of quantum coherence. We investigate the effects of the dipolar interaction, temperature, and magnetic field on these quantities. We then employ the same working medium in a quantum Otto cycle and study the absorbed and released heat, net work, and thermodynamic efficiency as functions of the magnetic-field modulation, dipolar interaction, and temperature bias. A direct comparison between the two protocols reveals a pronounced contrast in their response to the dipolar interaction. In the investigated parameter regime, increasing the dipolar interaction substantially enhances the maximum ergotropy and storage capacity of the quantum battery, whereas the maximum work extracted per Otto cycle decreases. The Otto efficiency exhibits a nonmonotonic dependence on the dipolar interaction while remaining below the Carnot bound. These results demonstrate that an enhancement of quantum energy-storage capability does not necessarily imply an enhancement of heat-to-work conversion. Our findings highlight the complementary nature of quantum batteries and quantum heat engines and show how microscopic spin interactions can be used to control different forms of quantum energy conversion within the same physical platform.
Abstract:We investigate the energetic and thermodynamic performance of an interacting two-qubit system serving as both a quantum battery and a quantum Otto heat engine. The working medium is described by an anisotropic Heisenberg Hamiltonian supplemented by a dipolar interaction, a symmetric spin--orbit interaction, and an external magnetic field. Within a unified microscopic framework, we first analyze a coherent unitary charging protocol and characterize the resulting energy-storage performance through the ergotropy, anti-ergotropy, charging power, storage capacity, and $\ell_1$-norm of quantum coherence. We investigate the effects of the dipolar interaction, temperature, and magnetic field on these quantities. We then employ the same working medium in a quantum Otto cycle and study the absorbed and released heat, net work, and thermodynamic efficiency as functions of the magnetic-field modulation, dipolar interaction, and temperature bias. A direct comparison between the two protocols reveals a pronounced contrast in their response to the dipolar interaction. In the investigated parameter regime, increasing the dipolar interaction substantially enhances the maximum ergotropy and storage capacity of the quantum battery, whereas the maximum work extracted per Otto cycle decreases. The Otto efficiency exhibits a nonmonotonic dependence on the dipolar interaction while remaining below the Carnot bound. These results demonstrate that an enhancement of quantum energy-storage capability does not necessarily imply an enhancement of heat-to-work conversion. Our findings highlight the complementary nature of quantum batteries and quantum heat engines and show how microscopic spin interactions can be used to control different forms of quantum energy conversion within the same physical platform.
arXiv:2608.19533 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.19533v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19533 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 340 words
Related coverage

Researchers Link Spin Coupling to Differing Energy Efficiencies
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 25, 2026

Quantum Systems Can Still Generate Power Despite Energy Loss
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 22, 2026

Forbes Asia 100 To Watch 2026
forbes.com · Aug 24, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026