aiqbench analysis
This study establishes quantitative operating rules for automating the calibration of large-scale superconducting quantum processors, directly addressing crosstalk from parallel operations and temporal parameter drift. By converting heuristic practices into measurable metrics based on error-budget consumption, the research demonstrates significant fidelity improvements on 337-qubit systems while enabling efficient concurrent maintenance tasks. These findings provide a critical engineering reference for sustaining control quality as quantum hardware scales beyond hundreds of qubits.
Quantitative Rules for Parallel Calibration and Drift-Resilient Maintenance of Large-Scale Superconducting Quantum Processors
arXiv:2610.11477v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As superconducting quantum processors scale toward hundreds of qubits, manual calibration becomes increasingly costly and difficult to sustain. Here we address two system-level factors governing automated calibration, namely, crosstalk induced by parallel operations and temporal drift of control parameters. On a 66-qubit superconducting processor, cross-entropy benchmarking shows that single-qubit calibration tolerates full-chip concurrency with minimal fidelity loss, whereas CZ calibration requires a minimum coupler-graph distance of four to avoid elevated control errors. Continuous monitoring of representative qubit and coupler parameters further yields quantitative refresh rules that assign refresh priority by error-budget consumption. These results turn two conventionally heuristic choices, the concurrency density of calibration tasks and the refresh priority of each control parameter, into measurable operating rules. Implemented within an automated calibration framework, the rules support a six-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state with a zero-noise-extrapolated fidelity of 89.64%, distance-dependent logical-error suppression in a single-cycle repetition-code benchmark, and a reduction of the mean single-qubit error from 0.023 to 0.011 on a 337-qubit processor, providing an experimentally grounded reference for the automated calibration and maintenance of current and future large-scale superconducting quantum systems.
Abstract:As superconducting quantum processors scale toward hundreds of qubits, manual calibration becomes increasingly costly and difficult to sustain. Here we address two system-level factors governing automated calibration, namely, crosstalk induced by parallel operations and temporal drift of control parameters. On a 66-qubit superconducting processor, cross-entropy benchmarking shows that single-qubit calibration tolerates full-chip concurrency with minimal fidelity loss, whereas CZ calibration requires a minimum coupler-graph distance of four to avoid elevated control errors. Continuous monitoring of representative qubit and coupler parameters further yields quantitative refresh rules that assign refresh priority by error-budget consumption. These results turn two conventionally heuristic choices, the concurrency density of calibration tasks and the refresh priority of each control parameter, into measurable operating rules. Implemented within an automated calibration framework, the rules support a six-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state with a zero-noise-extrapolated fidelity of 89.64%, distance-dependent logical-error suppression in a single-cycle repetition-code benchmark, and a reduction of the mean single-qubit error from 0.023 to 0.011 on a 337-qubit processor, providing an experimentally grounded reference for the automated calibration and maintenance of current and future large-scale superconducting quantum systems.
arXiv:2610.11477 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.11477v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11477 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Article: Multi-Agent AI for Production Security Operations: an A2A and MCP Architecture in a 5G Core
InfoQ · Jul 23, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026

Fireside chat
ecb.europa.eu · Sep 8, 2026