Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

The paper proposes quantile propagation planning, which pushes a small fixed set of disturbance quantiles through system dynamics to estimate both mean and tail cost, instead of spending a limited evaluation budget on noisy Monte Carlo rollouts. Its claims are bounded: exactness at the propagated levels, convergence as the grid is refined, and a one-sided conservatism guarantee under stated structural conditions. The results come from controlled overload and inventory tasks, so readers should check how well those conditions hold in messier, learned-model settings before treating it as a general tail-risk tool.
Source coveringarXiv

Quantile Propagation Planning for Budgeted Tail-Risk Evaluation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.41351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Risk-aware planning must identify rare, costly outcomes using only a limited number of model evaluations. Monte Carlo rollouts spend this budget on noisy tail estimates, while planning from the mean can miss the tail entirely. We introduce quantile propagation planning (QPP), which propagates a small, fixed set of disturbance quantiles through the dynamics and integrates the resulting cost curve to evaluate both mean and tail risk. The method is exact at the propagated levels, converges as the quantile grid is refined, and admits a one-sided conservatism guarantee under stated structural conditions. In controlled overload and inventory tasks, QPP reduces realized tail cost and constraint violations relative to mean-rollout planning. On overload, it remains competitive with sampled evaluators that use substantially more trajectories. These results position QPP as a transparent, budget-controlled approach to tail-risk evaluation.

Abstract:Risk-aware planning must identify rare, costly outcomes using only a limited number of model evaluations. Monte Carlo rollouts spend this budget on noisy tail estimates, while planning from the mean can miss the tail entirely. We introduce quantile propagation planning (QPP), which propagates a small, fixed set of disturbance quantiles through the dynamics and integrates the resulting cost curve to evaluate both mean and tail risk. The method is exact at the propagated levels, converges as the quantile grid is refined, and admits a one-sided conservatism guarantee under stated structural conditions. In controlled overload and inventory tasks, QPP reduces realized tail cost and constraint violations relative to mean-rollout planning. On overload, it remains competitive with sampled evaluators that use substantially more trajectories. These results position QPP as a transparent, budget-controlled approach to tail-risk evaluation.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY)

arXiv:2610.41351 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.41351v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41351 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 232 words

Related coverage