Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper proposes Control-TS, which steers a frozen pretrained diffusion forecaster with predicted quantiles, and reports better CRPS across eight benchmarks. The gains are measured against a single metric family, so readers should check whether they hold under the authors' capacity-matched comparisons and across different backbones. The new CLPS metric, which tests whether generated futures help a downstream linear predictor, is a useful complement to distributional scores.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Quantile-Guided Diffusion for Probabilistic Time-Series Forecasting

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.20739v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantile forecasts summarize uncertainty at each future time step, while diffusion forecasters represent it through sampled future trajectories. We study how predicted quantiles can serve as distributional controls for diffusion forecasting. Specifically, we investigate how the mechanism of quantile integration affects its effectiveness in guiding a pretrained diffusion forecaster. We find that residual control throughout the denoising network yields the most consistent improvements. We instantiate this approach as Control-TS, which learns a quantile-control pathway while keeping the pretrained backbone frozen. Across eight benchmarks, Control-TS consistently improves the backbone's CRPS, achieves competitive performance against state-of-the-art forecasting models, and retains its gains in capacity-matched comparisons. Further analyses examine how these gains depend on quantile granularity, predictor choice, and forecast quality. Finally, we introduce the Conditional Linear Predictive Score (CLPS), which complements distributional metrics by evaluating the downstream forecasting utility of generated futures. Together, these findings support predicted quantiles as an effective interface between explicit uncertainty estimates and diffusion-based trajectory generation.

Abstract:Quantile forecasts summarize uncertainty at each future time step, while diffusion forecasters represent it through sampled future trajectories. We study how predicted quantiles can serve as distributional controls for diffusion forecasting. Specifically, we investigate how the mechanism of quantile integration affects its effectiveness in guiding a pretrained diffusion forecaster. We find that residual control throughout the denoising network yields the most consistent improvements. We instantiate this approach as Control-TS, which learns a quantile-control pathway while keeping the pretrained backbone frozen. Across eight benchmarks, Control-TS consistently improves the backbone's CRPS, achieves competitive performance against state-of-the-art forecasting models, and retains its gains in capacity-matched comparisons. Further analyses examine how these gains depend on quantile granularity, predictor choice, and forecast quality. Finally, we introduce the Conditional Linear Predictive Score (CLPS), which complements distributional metrics by evaluating the downstream forecasting utility of generated futures. Together, these findings support predicted quantiles as an effective interface between explicit uncertainty estimates and diffusion-based trajectory generation.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.20739 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.20739v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20739 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words

Related coverage