aiqbench analysis
This study quantifies how engagement-optimized recommender systems create a specific "Engagement Trap" that disproportionately harms users with ADHD, causing higher levels of time blindness and emotional distress compared to neurotypical users. The research provides critical evidence for the need in AI safety and policy regarding algorithmic design that accounts for neurodiversity rather than treating all cognitive profiles as identical.
Quantifying the Engagement Trap: Impact of Short-form Video Recommender Systems on Users with ADHD
arXiv:2609.07795v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Short-form video platforms use recommender systems to maximize engagement through highly efficient personalized recommendations. However, the impact of these recommendations on users with ADHD compared to users without ADHD remains underexplored. Through this study, we introduce and operationalize the Engagement Trap, illustrating how recommender systems, while successfully optimizing for engagement, disproportionately disadvantage users with ADHD. This stratified study of 302 participants, recruited via the online platform Prolific, compares experiences between participants with and without ADHD. Our results show that while recommendations are perceived as relevant across groups, participants with ADHD report significantly higher levels of time blindness, post-usage regret, and emotional distress when consuming recommendations. Moreover, we collect feedback for several proof-of- concept, theoretical design interventions for neuro-inclusive design principles. These findings provide quantitative evidence of systemic differences in engagement-optimized recommender systems and highlight the unbalanced negative effects and interactions these systems create for participants with ADHD. We argue for neurodiversity-aware, human-centered design approaches that mitigate such algorithmic harms and support more equitable experiences.
Abstract:Short-form video platforms use recommender systems to maximize engagement through highly efficient personalized recommendations. However, the impact of these recommendations on users with ADHD compared to users without ADHD remains underexplored. Through this study, we introduce and operationalize the Engagement Trap, illustrating how recommender systems, while successfully optimizing for engagement, disproportionately disadvantage users with ADHD. This stratified study of 302 participants, recruited via the online platform Prolific, compares experiences between participants with and without ADHD. Our results show that while recommendations are perceived as relevant across groups, participants with ADHD report significantly higher levels of time blindness, post-usage regret, and emotional distress when consuming recommendations. Moreover, we collect feedback for several proof-of- concept, theoretical design interventions for neuro-inclusive design principles. These findings provide quantitative evidence of systemic differences in engagement-optimized recommender systems and highlight the unbalanced negative effects and interactions these systems create for participants with ADHD. We argue for neurodiversity-aware, human-centered design approaches that mitigate such algorithmic harms and support more equitable experiences.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.07795 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2609.07795v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07795 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words
Related coverage
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
Stop Chasing Views: How to Reduce x-Risk as an AI Safety Content Creator
LessWrong · Jul 19, 2026
Content Depth Matters in Short-Video Recommendation: Rethinking the Attention Economy
arXiv · Aug 17, 2026