aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a critical framework for quantifying privacy risks in genomic language models by integrating perplexity detection, canary sequence extraction, and membership inference into a unified evaluation pipeline. The study demonstrates that memorization behaviors vary significantly across model architectures and training regimes, proving that no single attack vector is sufficient to assess data leakage in this domain. Consequently, multi-vector privacy auditing must become standard practice for genomic AI systems before deployment on sensitive cohorts.
Quantifying Memorization and Privacy Risks in Genomic Language Models
arXiv:2603.08913v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Genomic language models (GLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for learning representations of DNA sequences, enabling advances in variant prediction, regulatory element identification, and cross-task transfer learning. However, as these models are increasingly trained or fine-tuned on sensitive genomic cohorts, they risk memorizing specific sequences from their training data, raising serious concerns around privacy, data leakage, and regulatory compliance. Despite growing awareness of memorization risks in general-purpose language models, little systematic evaluation exists for these risks in the genomic domain, where data exhibit unique properties such as a fixed nucleotide alphabet, strong biological structure, and individual identifiability. We present a comprehensive, multi-vector privacy evaluation framework designed to quantify memorization risks in GLMs. Our approach integrates three complementary risk assessment methodologies: perplexity-based detection, canary sequence extraction, and membership inference. These are combined into a unified evaluation pipeline that produces a worst-case memorization risk score. To enable controlled evaluation, we plant canary sequences at varying repetition rates into both synthetic and real genomic datasets, allowing precise quantification of how repetition and training dynamics influence memorization. We evaluate our framework across multiple GLM architectures, examining the relationship between sequence repetition, model capacity, and memorization risk. Our results establish that GLMs exhibit measurable memorization and that the degree of memorization varies across architectures and training regimes. These findings reveal that no single attack vector captures the full scope of memorization risk, underscoring the need for multi-vector privacy auditing as a standard practice for genomic AI systems.
Abstract:Genomic language models (GLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for learning representations of DNA sequences, enabling advances in variant prediction, regulatory element identification, and cross-task transfer learning. However, as these models are increasingly trained or fine-tuned on sensitive genomic cohorts, they risk memorizing specific sequences from their training data, raising serious concerns around privacy, data leakage, and regulatory compliance. Despite growing awareness of memorization risks in general-purpose language models, little systematic evaluation exists for these risks in the genomic domain, where data exhibit unique properties such as a fixed nucleotide alphabet, strong biological structure, and individual identifiability. We present a comprehensive, multi-vector privacy evaluation framework designed to quantify memorization risks in GLMs. Our approach integrates three complementary risk assessment methodologies: perplexity-based detection, canary sequence extraction, and membership inference. These are combined into a unified evaluation pipeline that produces a worst-case memorization risk score. To enable controlled evaluation, we plant canary sequences at varying repetition rates into both synthetic and real genomic datasets, allowing precise quantification of how repetition and training dynamics influence memorization. We evaluate our framework across multiple GLM architectures, examining the relationship between sequence repetition, model capacity, and memorization risk. Our results establish that GLMs exhibit measurable memorization and that the degree of memorization varies across architectures and training regimes. These findings reveal that no single attack vector captures the full scope of memorization risk, underscoring the need for multi-vector privacy auditing as a standard practice for genomic AI systems.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Genomics (q-bio.GN)
arXiv:2603.08913 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.08913v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.08913 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 340 words
Related coverage
Secrets Everywhere: Auditing Memorization in Mobility Prediction Models
arXiv · Aug 4, 2026
Estimating near-verbatim extraction risk in language models with decoding-constrained beam search
arXiv · Jul 22, 2026
Advancing the State-of-the-Art in Empirical Privacy Auditing
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026

AI in healthcare: applications and best practices
Databricks · Jul 24, 2026