aiqbench analysis
TechPulse take: This study introduces PerspectiveGap, a scalable computational framework that quantifies significant imbalances in media narratives surrounding police-involved deaths by contrasting clinical state bureaucrat perspectives with civilian discourse. The analysis of 4,000 Canadian articles over 25 years reveals a persistent underrepresentation of public viewpoints, offering a methodological benchmark for analyzing media construction of accountability narratives.
Quantifying Media Representation Dynamics Across 25 Years of News Reporting on Policing-related Deaths
arXiv:2606.06812v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We perform the largest known computational analysis of Canadian news narratives about police-involved deaths, spanning 4,000 articles from the last quarter-century. We develop a novel computational model, PerspectiveGap, grounded in prior sociological work on media representation of policing. We find that reporting on police-involved deaths on average features perspectives from state bureaucrats at a rate nearly three times as much as perspectives from other members of the public, including relatives, community members, eyewitnesses, lawyers representing the family, or civil liberties groups. A considerable fraction of articles contain no points of view from civilian actors, though civilian representation has increased in recent years. Qualitatively, we find that state bureaucrats' accounts of these deaths tend to be clinical and procedural, while civilian discourse carries considerably more emotional valence. The PerspectiveGap framework developed here can be contextualized to other jurisdictions, offering a scalable approach for analyzing how media systems construct narratives around policing and accountability.
Abstract:We perform the largest known computational analysis of Canadian news narratives about police-involved deaths, spanning 4,000 articles from the last quarter-century. We develop a novel computational model, PerspectiveGap, grounded in prior sociological work on media representation of policing. We find that reporting on police-involved deaths on average features perspectives from state bureaucrats at a rate nearly three times as much as perspectives from other members of the public, including relatives, community members, eyewitnesses, lawyers representing the family, or civil liberties groups. A considerable fraction of articles contain no points of view from civilian actors, though civilian representation has increased in recent years. Qualitatively, we find that state bureaucrats' accounts of these deaths tend to be clinical and procedural, while civilian discourse carries considerably more emotional valence. The PerspectiveGap framework developed here can be contextualized to other jurisdictions, offering a scalable approach for analyzing how media systems construct narratives around policing and accountability.
9 pages, 6 figures. Websci'26
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.06812 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.06812v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06812 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Proceedings of the 18th ACM Web Science Conference 2026 (pp. 421-429)
https://doi.org/10.1145/3795766.3799754 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 273 words
