Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

QuanReview addresses the critical challenge of maintaining data integrity in structured span annotations when large language models are integrated into the annotation loop. This open-source system provides an auditable workflow that aligns human and model outputs at the character level, automatically resolving conflicts via logged policies while directing human reviewers only to ambiguous cases. By significantly reducing manual review overhead without sacrificing trustworthiness, it offers a practical solution for scaling high-quality dataset creation in AI development pipelines.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

QuanReview: Offline, Auditable Reconciliation of Human and LLM Span Annotations

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.35685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Structured span annotations, such as quantities with their units, uncertainty modifiers, and event classes, are expensive to create and hard to keep trustworthy once language models enter the loop. We present QuanReview, an open-source system for auditing and correcting such annotation layers. QuanReview aligns two annotation streams over the same documents at character level, resolves unambiguous cases by an explicit and logged policy, and routes candidate conflicts to a browser-based adjudication interface where reviewers accept either side, build field-level hybrids, or flag items for re-annotation. A campaign manager assigns documents to multiple annotators with configurable redundancy, computes agreement at document and span level, auto-merges unanimous documents, and exports the corrected layer in the original file format, so that it can replace the original annotation files directly. Applied to a 4,457-record humanitarian benchmark and an LLM extraction stream, the system fully auto-merged 8% of documents, applied automatic policy decisions to a further 1,513 records, and concentrated human attention on 3,131 candidate conflicts, a mean of 5.4 per reviewed document.

Abstract:Structured span annotations, such as quantities with their units, uncertainty modifiers, and event classes, are expensive to create and hard to keep trustworthy once language models enter the loop. We present QuanReview, an open-source system for auditing and correcting such annotation layers. QuanReview aligns two annotation streams over the same documents at character level, resolves unambiguous cases by an explicit and logged policy, and routes candidate conflicts to a browser-based adjudication interface where reviewers accept either side, build field-level hybrids, or flag items for re-annotation. A campaign manager assigns documents to multiple annotators with configurable redundancy, computes agreement at document and span level, auto-merges unanimous documents, and exports the corrected layer in the original file format, so that it can replace the original annotation files directly. Applied to a 4,457-record humanitarian benchmark and an LLM extraction stream, the system fully auto-merged 8% of documents, applied automatic policy decisions to a further 1,513 records, and concentrated human attention on 3,131 candidate conflicts, a mean of 5.4 per reviewed document.

6 pages, 2 figures, 4 tables. System demonstration. Code and runnable demo: this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.35685 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.35685v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35685 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words

Related coverage