aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that Quadratic Integrate-and-Fire (QIF) neurons offer a practical advantage over standard Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) models by enabling smoother gradient descent and avoiding fragmented loss landscapes caused by discontinuous spike dynamics. Through hyperparameter optimization on the Spiking Heidelberg Digits dataset, QIF networks achieved superior performance, validating the shift toward continuous spiking models for more stable neuromorphic computing.
Quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons exhibit less fragmented loss landscapes and outperform leaky integrate-and-fire neurons in spike-based gradient descent
arXiv:2606.03935v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The ability to train spiking neural networks is essential for modeling biological neural networks as well as for neuromorphic computing. However, for the extensively used leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons, arbitrarily small parameter changes can induce spike (dis)appearances that disrupt subsequent activity, leading to unstable neural representations and permanently silent neurons during exact spike-based gradient descent. Recent work shows that a class of neuron models, which includes the quadratic integrate-and-fire (QIF) neuron, avoids these discontinuities and enables continuous and even smooth spike-based gradient descent. However, it remains unclear whether these advantages translate into practice. Here, we demonstrate that they do so via a controlled comparison between networks of LIF and QIF neurons on the popular Spiking Heidelberg Digits dataset. Specifically, in a first step, we perform a thorough hyperparameter search to optimize both models, revealing a clear performance advantage of QIF neurons. In a second step, we visualize the loss and gradient landscapes. Consistent with their inferior performance, we find that the loss landscapes of LIF neurons, which are discontinuous, appear more fragmented and the related gradients more erratic. An analysis of the landscapes of single samples indicates that these features arise from changes in the temporal order of spikes, which often cause disruptive spike (dis)appearances. Overall, our results advocate replacing LIF neurons with neuron models exhibiting continuous spiking dynamics, such as QIF neurons, for gradient descent training.
Abstract:The ability to train spiking neural networks is essential for modeling biological neural networks as well as for neuromorphic computing. However, for the extensively used leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons, arbitrarily small parameter changes can induce spike (dis)appearances that disrupt subsequent activity, leading to unstable neural representations and permanently silent neurons during exact spike-based gradient descent. Recent work shows that a class of neuron models, which includes the quadratic integrate-and-fire (QIF) neuron, avoids these discontinuities and enables continuous and even smooth spike-based gradient descent. However, it remains unclear whether these advantages translate into practice. Here, we demonstrate that they do so via a controlled comparison between networks of LIF and QIF neurons on the popular Spiking Heidelberg Digits dataset. Specifically, in a first step, we perform a thorough hyperparameter search to optimize both models, revealing a clear performance advantage of QIF neurons. In a second step, we visualize the loss and gradient landscapes. Consistent with their inferior performance, we find that the loss landscapes of LIF neurons, which are discontinuous, appear more fragmented and the related gradients more erratic. An analysis of the landscapes of single samples indicates that these features arise from changes in the temporal order of spikes, which often cause disruptive spike (dis)appearances. Overall, our results advocate replacing LIF neurons with neuron models exhibiting continuous spiking dynamics, such as QIF neurons, for gradient descent training.
Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.03935 [cs.NE]
(or arXiv:2606.03935v1 [cs.NE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03935 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 326 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

How do neural networks regress cubic polynomials? Apparently, they use a trick invented in Milan 500 years ago
LessWrong · Jul 22, 2026

Import AI 470: No rights for machines; automating environment generation with SPADE; and building better GPU kernels with Hawkeye
Import AI · Aug 24, 2026