QSTAR: Quantum Selective Transfer with Adaptive Routing

arXiv:2607.21411v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum transfer learning (QTL) is often evaluated by replacing a classical classifier with a fixed variational quantum head, but this hides a key question: when is the quantum branch actually useful? We propose QSTAR: Quantum Selective Transfer with Adaptive Routing, a selective QTL framework that keeps high-confidence classical predictions and routes only low-confidence samples to a fallback branch. Using a frozen ResNet18 backbone on Fashion-MNIST, we compare manually designed QTL heads, KetGPT-designed quantum heads, and parameter-matched classical baselines under a common data split and optimization schedule. Standard QTL heads reach at most 57.0% accuracy, while the strongest KetGPT head in the main filtered sweep reaches 78.5% accuracy and 0.785 F1-score. Although the strongest fixed classical head remains higher at 81.6%, selective routing gives the quantum branch a clearer role. On low-confidence samples, KetGPT #180 improves accuracy over a parameter-matched MLP fallback by 6.82, 4.31, and 3.03 percentage points at thresholds of 0.70, 0.80, and 0.90. At the full-system level, Adaptive KetGPT-QTL reaches 80.9% accuracy and 0.807 F1-score, outperforming the adaptive classical baseline. A separate compact-circuit ablation identifies KetGPT #160 as a stronger fixed-head candidate, reaching 81.9% accuracy with only 10 quantum parameters and 9 gates. These results suggest that architecture-searched quantum heads are most useful as targeted fallback branches for uncertain inputs rather than uniform replacements for classical classifiers.

Abstract:Quantum transfer learning (QTL) is often evaluated by replacing a classical classifier with a fixed variational quantum head, but this hides a key question: when is the quantum branch actually useful? We propose QSTAR: Quantum Selective Transfer with Adaptive Routing, a selective QTL framework that keeps high-confidence classical predictions and routes only low-confidence samples to a fallback branch. Using a frozen ResNet18 backbone on Fashion-MNIST, we compare manually designed QTL heads, KetGPT-designed quantum heads, and parameter-matched classical baselines under a common data split and optimization schedule. Standard QTL heads reach at most 57.0% accuracy, while the strongest KetGPT head in the main filtered sweep reaches 78.5% accuracy and 0.785 F1-score. Although the strongest fixed classical head remains higher at 81.6%, selective routing gives the quantum branch a clearer role. On low-confidence samples, KetGPT #180 improves accuracy over a parameter-matched MLP fallback by 6.82, 4.31, and 3.03 percentage points at thresholds of 0.70, 0.80, and 0.90. At the full-system level, Adaptive KetGPT-QTL reaches 80.9% accuracy and 0.807 F1-score, outperforming the adaptive classical baseline. A separate compact-circuit ablation identifies KetGPT #160 as a stronger fixed-head candidate, reaching 81.9% accuracy with only 10 quantum parameters and 9 gates. These results suggest that architecture-searched quantum heads are most useful as targeted fallback branches for uncertain inputs rather than uniform replacements for classical classifiers.

arXiv:2607.21411 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2607.21411v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21411 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

QSTAR: Quantum Selective Transfer with Adaptive Routing

Related coverage