aiqbench analysis
This research introduces QO-Bench, a new benchmark that shifts the focus of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) from semantic relevance to preserving typed event tuples required for correct query execution. The study reveals that current systems often discard the specific operators needed for database-style logic, proving that operator-level execution is a distinct bottleneck separate from retrieval quality. By diagnosing failures across different query operators like joins and intersections, this work provides a critical roadmap for improving the structural integrity of AI-driven data analysis.
QO-Bench: Diagnosing Query-Operator-Preserving Retrieval over Typed Event Tuples
arXiv:2606.04646v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many real-world questions over business, legal, and scientific corpora are natural-language versions of database-style queries over records latent in text. Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems are optimized primarily for semantic relevance, but retrieving plausible passages does not guarantee correct query execution. We introduce QO-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for query-operator question answering over typed event tuples. The benchmark covers 22,984 news articles and 614 corporate events, with 18 query templates instantiating 785 questions. Each gold answer is deterministically computed from typed event tuples and scored by recall, with answers matched to the gold tuples by exact match rather than an LLM judge. This design enables operator-level diagnosis such as joins and intersection. We evaluate RAG, ReAct RAG, GraphRAG, and information-extraction-to-SQL under matched conditions, with a long-context oracle ceiling to isolate retrieval failure. A two-axis framework -- index-time preservation versus query-time execution -- predicts where each paradigm fails, and the results bear it out: systems retrieve relevant text but discard the typed values operators need, and the deployable paradigm ranking inverts across operators, with similarity retrieval leading on filter/project and extraction-to-SQL on intersection and counting. Even given the gold evidence, a long-context oracle stays far from saturated, so operator execution -- not retrieval alone -- is a core bottleneck that a stronger answer model does not remove. QO-Bench reframes the goal from passage relevance to query-operator-preserving retrieval. The benchmark, predictions, and code are released at https://github.com/ZHANG-MENGAO/qo-bench.
Abstract:Many real-world questions over business, legal, and scientific corpora are natural-language versions of database-style queries over records latent in text. Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems are optimized primarily for semantic relevance, but retrieving plausible passages does not guarantee correct query execution. We introduce QO-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for query-operator question answering over typed event tuples. The benchmark covers 22,984 news articles and 614 corporate events, with 18 query templates instantiating 785 questions. Each gold answer is deterministically computed from typed event tuples and scored by recall, with answers matched to the gold tuples by exact match rather than an LLM judge. This design enables operator-level diagnosis such as joins and intersection. We evaluate RAG, ReAct RAG, GraphRAG, and information-extraction-to-SQL under matched conditions, with a long-context oracle ceiling to isolate retrieval failure. A two-axis framework -- index-time preservation versus query-time execution -- predicts where each paradigm fails, and the results bear it out: systems retrieve relevant text but discard the typed values operators need, and the deployable paradigm ranking inverts across operators, with similarity retrieval leading on filter/project and extraction-to-SQL on intersection and counting. Even given the gold evidence, a long-context oracle stays far from saturated, so operator execution -- not retrieval alone -- is a core bottleneck that a stronger answer model does not remove. QO-Bench reframes the goal from passage relevance to query-operator-preserving retrieval. The benchmark, predictions, and code are released at this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
arXiv:2606.04646 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.04646v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04646 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 335 words
Related coverage
QO-Bench: Diagnosing Query-Operator-Preserving Retrieval over Typed Event Tuples
arXiv · Jun 4, 2026

Reducing medical claims review time with AI on AWS: The EXL Medical IDP solution
AWS · Sep 21, 2026
All-Mem: Agentic Lifelong Memory via Dynamic Topology Evolution
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026
MUUNRiver-Bench: Diagnosing Relation-Dependent Music Retrieval with Multimodal Instructions
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026