Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Pyramidal Width Can Increase Under Vertex Insertion
arXiv:2607.29555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Lacoste-Julien and Jaggi conjectured in 2015 that the pyramidal width of a polytope cannot increase when a vertex is added, provided that every old point remains a vertex. We give an exact counterexample with six integer points in $\R^3$. For \[ P=\conv\{v_0,\ldots,v_4\},\qquad Q=\conv\{v_0,\ldots,v_5\}, \] where \[ \begin{aligned} v_0&=(-1,-3,-1), & v_1&=(3,2,-2), & v_2&=(0,2,1),\\ v_3&=(-1,-3,3), & v_4&=(-2,0,1), & v_5&=(-1,0,-2), \end{aligned} \] all five vertices of $P$ remain vertices of $Q$, but \[ \PWidth(P)^2=\frac{48}{353} \quad\text{and}\quad \PWidth(Q)^2=\frac{36}{133}. \] Thus vertex insertion increases pyramidal width by the factor $\sqrt{1059/532}\approx 1.410886779$. The proof uses the equivalence between pyramidal width and facial distance, certifies both face lattices by integer supporting hyperplanes, and evaluates every facial distance by a finite rational calculation. A dependency-free exact verifier accompanies the paper.
Abstract:Lacoste-Julien and Jaggi conjectured in 2015 that the pyramidal width of a polytope cannot increase when a vertex is added, provided that every old point remains a vertex. We give an exact counterexample with six integer points in $\R^3$. For \[ P=\conv\{v_0,\ldots,v_4\},\qquad Q=\conv\{v_0,\ldots,v_5\}, \] where \[ \begin{aligned} v_0&=(-1,-3,-1), & v_1&=(3,2,-2), & v_2&=(0,2,1),\\ v_3&=(-1,-3,3), & v_4&=(-2,0,1), & v_5&=(-1,0,-2), \end{aligned} \] all five vertices of $P$ remain vertices of $Q$, but \[ \PWidth(P)^2=\frac{48}{353} \quad\text{and}\quad \PWidth(Q)^2=\frac{36}{133}. \] Thus vertex insertion increases pyramidal width by the factor $\sqrt{1059/532}\approx 1.410886779$. The proof uses the equivalence between pyramidal width and facial distance, certifies both face lattices by integer supporting hyperplanes, and evaluates every facial distance by a finite rational calculation. A dependency-free exact verifier accompanies the paper.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.29555 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.29555v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29555 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 215 words
Related coverage
Notes on Algorithms
LessWrong · Jun 10, 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026
Scaling Laws for Hypernetwork-Based Knowledge Injection in Large Language Models
arXiv · Jul 23, 2026
SPI: Query-Depth-Adaptive Indexing for Streaming RAG in Vector Databases
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026