aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates a novel "one-poison" backdoor attack on linear models and ReLU neural networks, proving that a single malicious sample can compromise model integrity without requiring detailed knowledge of the training data. The study establishes provable conditions for such attacks while confirming they maintain zero error on benign tasks and do not significantly degrade overall performance. These findings highlight critical vulnerabilities in machine learning systems trained on untrusted sources, emphasizing the need for robust defenses against minimal-data poisoning vectors.
Provable one-poison backdoor attacks on linear models and ReLU neural networks
arXiv:2508.05600v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Backdoor poisoning attacks are a threat to machine learning models that are trained on data collected from untrusted sources; these attacks enable attackers to inject malicious behavior into the model that can be triggered by specially crafted inputs. Prior work has established bounds on the success of backdoor attacks and their impact on the benign learning task, however, an open question is what amount of poison data is needed for a successful backdoor attack. Typical attacks either use few samples but need much information about the data points, or need to poison many data points. In this paper, we show that an adversary can mount a one-poison backdoor attack without knowledge of individual training data, requiring only coarse geometric bounds of the input space and training parameters. We identify provably sufficient conditions that allow an adversary with one poison sample with high probability to inject a backdoor into linear models and MLPs. We show that our backdoor has zero backdooring error and the injection does not significantly impact the benign learning task performance.
Abstract:Backdoor poisoning attacks are a threat to machine learning models that are trained on data collected from untrusted sources; these attacks enable attackers to inject malicious behavior into the model that can be triggered by specially crafted inputs. Prior work has established bounds on the success of backdoor attacks and their impact on the benign learning task, however, an open question is what amount of poison data is needed for a successful backdoor attack. Typical attacks either use few samples but need much information about the data points, or need to poison many data points. In this paper, we show that an adversary can mount a one-poison backdoor attack without knowledge of individual training data, requiring only coarse geometric bounds of the input space and training parameters. We identify provably sufficient conditions that allow an adversary with one poison sample with high probability to inject a backdoor into linear models and MLPs. We show that our backdoor has zero backdooring error and the injection does not significantly impact the benign learning task performance.
Added generalization to k-layer (k>=2) ReLU neural networks. Added acknowledgement
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2508.05600 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2508.05600v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.05600 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage
Why Backdooring Neural Networks is so Easy?
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Security Properties of Neural Networks as Decision Problems
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026
RPP: A Certified Poisoned-Sample Detection Framework for Backdoor Attacks under Dataset Imbalance
arXiv · Oct 12, 2026
Differentially-Private Decision Trees and Provable Robustness to Data Poisoning
arXiv · Sep 28, 2026