aiqbench analysis
The study finds that evaluation protocol choices, such as predictor selection, client-level resampling, and which validation round is reported, shifted discrimination in federated mortality models more than the choice of aggregation algorithm did. The SCAFFOLD lead over the other six strategies was small (at most 0.008 AUC-ROC), so rankings between federated optimizers may be less robust than published comparisons suggest. Readers building clinical federated systems should treat protocol standardization as a prerequisite for meaningful benchmarks.
Protocol Choices Matter More Than the Aggregation Algorithm: Federated Learning for In-Hospital Mortality Prediction in Care-Unit and Multi-Hospital Federations
arXiv:2610.17265v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning allows hospitals to train a shared mortality model without pooling their records, but published comparisons of aggregation strategies rarely control the evaluation protocol. This study compared seven strategies (FedAvg, FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedAdagrad, FedAdam, FedYogi and FedCluster) on two federations built with one pipeline: 12 care units of a hospital in MIMIC-IV and 49 hospitals in eICU-CRD. Each strategy was tuned and selected on validation data by the same rule, and every comparison was repeated across 10 seeds with Friedman and Holm-corrected tests. SCAFFOLD ranked first in both federations (AUC-ROC 0.886 and 0.819) and in 17 of 18 variants, but its margin over the runner-up never exceeded 0.008, and a control sharing its local optimizer attributed most of its margin over FedAvg to drift correction. On the multi-hospital federation, federated training matched centralized training. In the care-unit federation, three protocol choices changed discrimination by more than the choice of strategy did: discharge-coded predictors (+0.038 in AUC-ROC), client-level SMOTE (up to -0.074), and evaluating the last instead of the best validation round (up to -0.084). Platt scaling on validation data repaired the risks distorted by imbalance corrections without loss of discrimination. Studies should therefore fix the protocol before ranking algorithms.
Abstract:Federated learning allows hospitals to train a shared mortality model without pooling their records, but published comparisons of aggregation strategies rarely control the evaluation protocol. This study compared seven strategies (FedAvg, FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedAdagrad, FedAdam, FedYogi and FedCluster) on two federations built with one pipeline: 12 care units of a hospital in MIMIC-IV and 49 hospitals in eICU-CRD. Each strategy was tuned and selected on validation data by the same rule, and every comparison was repeated across 10 seeds with Friedman and Holm-corrected tests. SCAFFOLD ranked first in both federations (AUC-ROC 0.886 and 0.819) and in 17 of 18 variants, but its margin over the runner-up never exceeded 0.008, and a control sharing its local optimizer attributed most of its margin over FedAvg to drift correction. On the multi-hospital federation, federated training matched centralized training. In the care-unit federation, three protocol choices changed discrimination by more than the choice of strategy did: discharge-coded predictors (+0.038 in AUC-ROC), client-level SMOTE (up to -0.074), and evaluating the last instead of the best validation round (up to -0.084). Platt scaling on validation data repaired the risks distorted by imbalance corrections without loss of discrimination. Studies should therefore fix the protocol before ranking algorithms.
23 pages, 6 figures, 10 tables. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)
I.2.6; J.3; C.2.4
arXiv:2610.17265 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.17265v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17265 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 317 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

How To Prepare For Quantum Computing, The Complete Readiness Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 31, 2026

Accelerating Federated Learning Research with AI Agents and NVIDIA FLARE Auto-FL
NVIDIA · Jun 9, 2026

Enterprise Quantum Cybersecurity, a Practical Guide for 2026
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 14, 2026