aiqbench analysis
This paper provides the first rigorous proof of the "hiding conjecture" for Gaussian boson sampling with fully squeezed input modes, a configuration recently achieved in laboratory settings. By establishing that classical simulation remains hard in this regime, the work solidifies the theoretical foundation for demonstrating quantum computational advantage using photonic systems. This advancement elevates GBS to a status comparable with conventional boson sampling regarding its resistance to classical approximation.
Proof of hiding conjecture in Gaussian boson sampling
arXiv:2508.00983v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is a promising protocol for demonstrating quantum computational advantage. One of the key steps in the argument for classical hardness of GBS is the so-called ``hiding conjecture'', which asserts that one can ``hide'' a complex Gaussian matrix as a submatrix of the symmetric product of Haar unitary submatrices in total variation distance. In this paper, we prove the hiding conjecture for input states with all input modes squeezed, which is a setup that has recently been realized experimentally [Madsen et al., Nature 606, 75 (2022)]. In this setting, the hiding conjecture states that a $o(\sqrt{M})\times o(\sqrt{M})$ submatrix of an $M\times M$ circular orthogonal ensemble (COE) random matrix can be well-approximated by a complex symmetric Gaussian matrix in total variation distance as $M\to\infty$. This is the first rigorous proof of the hiding property for GBS in the experimentally relevant regime, and puts the argument for hardness of classically simulating GBS with the maximum number of squeezed input modes on a comparable level to that of the conventional boson sampling of [Aaronson and Arkhipov, Theory Comput. 9, 143 (2013)].
Abstract:Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is a promising protocol for demonstrating quantum computational advantage. One of the key steps in the argument for classical hardness of GBS is the so-called ``hiding conjecture'', which asserts that one can ``hide'' a complex Gaussian matrix as a submatrix of the symmetric product of Haar unitary submatrices in total variation distance. In this paper, we prove the hiding conjecture for input states with all input modes squeezed, which is a setup that has recently been realized experimentally [Madsen et al., Nature 606, 75 (2022)]. In this setting, the hiding conjecture states that a $o(\sqrt{M})\times o(\sqrt{M})$ submatrix of an $M\times M$ circular orthogonal ensemble (COE) random matrix can be well-approximated by a complex symmetric Gaussian matrix in total variation distance as $M\to\infty$. This is the first rigorous proof of the hiding property for GBS in the experimentally relevant regime, and puts the argument for hardness of classically simulating GBS with the maximum number of squeezed input modes on a comparable level to that of the conventional boson sampling of [Aaronson and Arkhipov, Theory Comput. 9, 143 (2013)].
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Mathematical Physics (math-ph)
arXiv:2508.00983 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2508.00983v3 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.00983 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage

Researchers Prove Conjecture Supporting GBS Quantum Advantage
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 24, 2026
Proof of the hiding conjecture for Gaussian boson sampling with an arbitrary number of squeezed input modes
arXiv · Aug 21, 2026

Researchers Link Gaussian Matrices to Quantum Sampling Advantage
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 5, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026