Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the inefficiency of current prompt engineering by proposing frameworks to identify minimal, information-dense inputs that maintain high output fidelity. By reducing input redundancy, this work offers practical pathways to lower computational overhead and inference latency while potentially mitigating accuracy degradation caused by excessive context.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Prompt Minimization: Reducing Input Redundancy Without Sacrificing Output Fidelity

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.31505v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite the growing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), prompt design remains largely heuristic and ad hoc. This project will explore $\textit{prompt minimization}$, the process of reducing prompts to their smallest, most information-dense form while preserving output fidelity. Practically, shorter prompts reduce computational overhead and inference latency, especially when large contexts, such as entire documents or codebases, are included unnecessarily. Further, longer prompts can damage LLM reasoning and accuracy. Theoretically, the existence of multiple prompts yielding equivalent outputs suggests a high degree of redundancy in the input space, raising fundamental questions about what information is essential to elicit specific model behaviors. We propose three variant frameworks to identify and evaluate minimal prompts and demonstrate that minimal prompts often produce outputs comparable to those of their longer counterparts. These findings suggest new directions for efficient prompt engineering and deepen our understanding of input compression in LLMs.

Abstract:Despite the growing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), prompt design remains largely heuristic and ad hoc. This project will explore $\textit{prompt minimization}$, the process of reducing prompts to their smallest, most information-dense form while preserving output fidelity. Practically, shorter prompts reduce computational overhead and inference latency, especially when large contexts, such as entire documents or codebases, are included unnecessarily. Further, longer prompts can damage LLM reasoning and accuracy. Theoretically, the existence of multiple prompts yielding equivalent outputs suggests a high degree of redundancy in the input space, raising fundamental questions about what information is essential to elicit specific model behaviors. We propose three variant frameworks to identify and evaluate minimal prompts and demonstrate that minimal prompts often produce outputs comparable to those of their longer counterparts. These findings suggest new directions for efficient prompt engineering and deepen our understanding of input compression in LLMs.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.31505 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.31505v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31505 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 239 words

Related coverage