aiqbench analysis
This research exposes "F1 Inflation," revealing how numeric anchoring in prompts artificially boosts count-based error detection scores without improving actual span localization accuracy. By introducing ErrorBench, the study demonstrates that highly compliant models like GPT and Claude are particularly susceptible to this distortion compared to others like Gemini. Consequently, evaluations for LLM proofreading must prioritize span-aware metrics over simple counts to avoid misleading performance assessments.
Prompt Framing Distorts Count Based Evaluation of LLM Error Detection: Evidence from Numeric Anchoring
arXiv:2607.01240v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Count-based F1 is widely used as a proxy for LLM error-detection quality, but this paper shows that it can rise dramatically without a corresponding improvement in span localization, a gap termed F1 Inflation. The paper introduces ErrorBench, a controlled stress-test protocol for prompt-induced count distortion. ErrorBench evaluates six contemporary LLMs under five prompt conditions over 4,290 responses from 143 CoNLL-2014 passages. Under CoNLL-2014 M2-style scoring, anchored prompts produce up to 0.79 points of F1 Inflation, and up to 0.96 under strict matching. A 100-passage replication using the official ERRANT 3.0.0 pipeline and multi-reference scoring reproduces the pattern: averaged over six models, the Blind-to-Anchored prompt shift raises Count-F1 by +0.21 while raising multi-reference ERRANT F0.5 by only +0.04. The study finds larger count responses in highly instruction-compliant GPT/Claude systems and smaller responses in the Gemini family under this stress-test protocol. The findings suggest that LLM proofreading and document-review evaluations should avoid pre-populated error counts and should report span-aware metrics alongside count-based metrics.
Abstract:Count-based F1 is widely used as a proxy for LLM error-detection quality, but this paper shows that it can rise dramatically without a corresponding improvement in span localization, a gap termed F1 Inflation. The paper introduces ErrorBench, a controlled stress-test protocol for prompt-induced count distortion. ErrorBench evaluates six contemporary LLMs under five prompt conditions over 4,290 responses from 143 CoNLL-2014 passages. Under CoNLL-2014 M2-style scoring, anchored prompts produce up to 0.79 points of F1 Inflation, and up to 0.96 under strict matching. A 100-passage replication using the official ERRANT 3.0.0 pipeline and multi-reference scoring reproduces the pattern: averaged over six models, the Blind-to-Anchored prompt shift raises Count-F1 by +0.21 while raising multi-reference ERRANT F0.5 by only +0.04. The study finds larger count responses in highly instruction-compliant GPT/Claude systems and smaller responses in the Gemini family under this stress-test protocol. The findings suggest that LLM proofreading and document-review evaluations should avoid pre-populated error counts and should report span-aware metrics alongside count-based metrics.
15 pages, 6 figures, 12 tables. Preprint under review
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
I.2.7; I.2.6; H.3.3
arXiv:2607.01240 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.01240v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.01240 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

Implementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals
METR · Sep 27, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026