aiqbench analysis
This research introduces ProCompNav, a framework that enhances natural-language instance navigation by using recursive comparative judgment to ask minimal, high-value questions for disambiguation. By iteratively narrowing candidate pools through binary queries rather than demanding unique attributes, the system significantly reduces user response length while improving success rates on benchmarks like CoIN-Bench. The approach represents a meaningful advance in conversational AI agents capable of handling ambiguous requests with greater efficiency and user preference.
ProCompNav: Proactive Instance Navigation with Comparative Judgment for Ambiguous User Queries
arXiv:2605.06223v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Natural-language instance navigation becomes challenging when the initial user request does not uniquely specify the target instance. A practical agent should reduce the user's burden by actively asking only the information needed to distinguish the target from similar distractors, rather than requiring a detailed description upfront. Existing approaches often fall short of this goal by mistaking distractors that strongly match the accumulated information about the target provided by the user. As a result, despite the dialogue, the agent may still fail to distinguish the target from distractors, leading to premature decisions and lengthy user responses. We propose Proactive Instance Navigation with Comparative Judgment (ProCompNav), a two-stage framework that first constructs a candidate pool and then identifies the target through Recursive Comparative Judgment (RCJ). RCJ iteratively narrows the pool by selecting an attribute-value pair that divides the candidates, asking the user a binary question, and removing inconsistent candidates, without requiring an attribute unique to the target. On CoIN-Bench, ProCompNav outperforms the evaluated baselines in Success Rate while substantially reducing Response Length. On the non-interactive TextNav benchmark, ProCompNav achieves the highest Success Rate. Two human studies further show that participants prefer ProCompNav's interaction strategies.
Abstract:Natural-language instance navigation becomes challenging when the initial user request does not uniquely specify the target instance. A practical agent should reduce the user's burden by actively asking only the information needed to distinguish the target from similar distractors, rather than requiring a detailed description upfront. Existing approaches often fall short of this goal by mistaking distractors that strongly match the accumulated information about the target provided by the user. As a result, despite the dialogue, the agent may still fail to distinguish the target from distractors, leading to premature decisions and lengthy user responses. We propose Proactive Instance Navigation with Comparative Judgment (ProCompNav), a two-stage framework that first constructs a candidate pool and then identifies the target through Recursive Comparative Judgment (RCJ). RCJ iteratively narrows the pool by selecting an attribute-value pair that divides the candidates, asking the user a binary question, and removing inconsistent candidates, without requiring an attribute unique to the target. On CoIN-Bench, ProCompNav outperforms the evaluated baselines in Success Rate while substantially reducing Response Length. On the non-interactive TextNav benchmark, ProCompNav achieves the highest Success Rate. Two human studies further show that participants prefer ProCompNav's interaction strategies.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2605.06223 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.06223v4 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06223 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 286 words
Related coverage

How an AWS team detects dashboard content failures at scale using Amazon Bedrock
AWS · Sep 2, 2026
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

How to Run an Autoresearch Workflow with RL Agent Skills and NVIDIA NeMo
NVIDIA · Jul 14, 2026

How Photonic Chips Differ From Electronic Chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 19, 2026