aiqbench analysis
ProcessThinker introduces a practical post-training pipeline that delivers step-level process rewards for multi-modal reasoning without the need to train an explicit process reward model. By leveraging rollout-based sampling and empirical success rates, the method provides dense credit assignment to correct inconsistent reasoning trajectories early in the chain. This approach effectively addresses the limitations of sparse outcome-only rewards, offering a cost-efficient alternative for improving logical consistency in video question answering tasks.
ProcessThinker: Enhancing Multi-modal Large Language Models Reasoning via Rollout-based Process Reward
arXiv:2606.11209v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual question answering increasingly requires multi-step reasoning. Recent post-training with reinforcement learning under verifiable rewards (RLVR) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) can improve multimodal reasoning, but most approaches rely on sparse outcome-only rewards. As a result, they struggle to tell whether an incorrect answer comes from a small mistake late in the reasoning or from an unhelpful trajectory from the start. A common solution is to train a process reward model (PRM) for step-level supervision, but this typically requires large-scale high-quality chain-of-thought annotations and additional training cost. We propose ProcessThinker, a practical post-training pipeline that provides step-level process rewards without training an explicit PRM. ProcessThinker first rewrites reasoning traces into a step-tagged format for cold-start supervised fine-tuning, then applies GRPO with a standard format reward and our rollout-based process reward. Concretely, for each intermediate step, we sample multiple continuations from that step and use the empirical success rate (final-answer verification) as the step reward. This gives dense credit assignment and encourages reasoning steps that more reliably support a correct conclusion, helping reduce inconsistent or self-contradictory progress across steps -- a key issue in logical reasoning. Across four challenging video benchmarks (Video-MMMU, MMVU, VideoMathQA, and LongVideoBench), ProcessThinker consistently improves over the baseline model Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
Abstract:Visual question answering increasingly requires multi-step reasoning. Recent post-training with reinforcement learning under verifiable rewards (RLVR) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) can improve multimodal reasoning, but most approaches rely on sparse outcome-only rewards. As a result, they struggle to tell whether an incorrect answer comes from a small mistake late in the reasoning or from an unhelpful trajectory from the start. A common solution is to train a process reward model (PRM) for step-level supervision, but this typically requires large-scale high-quality chain-of-thought annotations and additional training cost. We propose ProcessThinker, a practical post-training pipeline that provides step-level process rewards without training an explicit PRM. ProcessThinker first rewrites reasoning traces into a step-tagged format for cold-start supervised fine-tuning, then applies GRPO with a standard format reward and our rollout-based process reward. Concretely, for each intermediate step, we sample multiple continuations from that step and use the empirical success rate (final-answer verification) as the step reward. This gives dense credit assignment and encourages reasoning steps that more reliably support a correct conclusion, helping reduce inconsistent or self-contradictory progress across steps -- a key issue in logical reasoning. Across four challenging video benchmarks (Video-MMMU, MMVU, VideoMathQA, and LongVideoBench), ProcessThinker consistently improves over the baseline model Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
Accepted at ICLR 2026 Workshop on Logical Reasoning of Large Language Models. 7 pages, 1 figure
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.11209 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.11209v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.11209 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 319 words
Related coverage
MMR-V: What's Left Unsaid? A Benchmark for Multimodal Deep Reasoning in Videos
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026
Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization
Amazon Science · Jul 26, 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · May 27, 2026
MCERF: Advancing Multimodal LLM Evaluation of Engineering Documentation with Enhanced Retrieval
arXiv · Jun 8, 2026