Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research benchmarks probabilistic machine learning models, specifically comparing Gaussian Processes and normalizing flows against recurrent neural networks for predicting atmospheric seeing. The study highlights that deep learning approaches like LSTM and FloTS outperform standard baselines while offering superior uncertainty quantification for optical turbulence forecasting. These findings are critical for optimizing performance in astronomical observations and free-space optical communication systems where rapid environmental changes impact system reliability.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Probabilistic Machine Learning for Short-Term Atmospheric Seeing Forecasting

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.29654v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate short-term forecasting of atmospheric seeing is of significant interest for astronomical observations and free-space optical communication systems, where rapid variations in optical turbulence can affect system performance and operational planning. In this work, we benchmark machine learning models for predicting atmospheric seeing up to two hours in advance, with a particular focus on probabilistic forecasting and uncertainty quantification. We compare two probabilistic approaches, Gaussian Processes (GPs) and a normalizing-flow- based model (FloTS), against deterministic recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) baselines. All models are trained and evaluated on seeing measurements from the Maunakea summit. We assess the models using both deterministic metrics, including the root mean square error and the Pearson correlation coefficient, and probabilistic metrics that evaluate the quality and calibration of predictive uncertainty estimates. The results show that deep learning approaches outperform standard recurrent networks for short-term forecasting, with LSTM and FloTS achieving the best overall predictive accuracy. While Gaussian Processes provide a useful probabilistic baseline, their predictive distributions are limited by the Gaussian assumption. FloTS combines competitive forecasting accuracy with flexible uncertainty quantification and produces the most informative probabilistic forecasts.

Abstract:Accurate short-term forecasting of atmospheric seeing is of significant interest for astronomical observations and free-space optical communication systems, where rapid variations in optical turbulence can affect system performance and operational planning. In this work, we benchmark machine learning models for predicting atmospheric seeing up to two hours in advance, with a particular focus on probabilistic forecasting and uncertainty quantification. We compare two probabilistic approaches, Gaussian Processes (GPs) and a normalizing-flow- based model (FloTS), against deterministic recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) baselines. All models are trained and evaluated on seeing measurements from the Maunakea summit. We assess the models using both deterministic metrics, including the root mean square error and the Pearson correlation coefficient, and probabilistic metrics that evaluate the quality and calibration of predictive uncertainty estimates. The results show that deep learning approaches outperform standard recurrent networks for short-term forecasting, with LSTM and FloTS achieving the best overall predictive accuracy. While Gaussian Processes provide a useful probabilistic baseline, their predictive distributions are limited by the Gaussian assumption. FloTS combines competitive forecasting accuracy with flexible uncertainty quantification and produces the most informative probabilistic forecasts.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)

arXiv:2610.29654 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.29654v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.29654 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 14152, 141520J (2026)

https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3103367 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 304 words

Related coverage