aiqbench analysis
This article introduces Pro-Bench, a rigorous benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness of open-vocabulary visual grounding models in real-world robotic environments rather than relying on synthetic or web-scraped data. The study reveals significant architecture-dependent variations in how models handle diverse natural language prompts, highlighting that high aggregate accuracy can mask inconsistencies in target recovery across query reformulations. This work is critical for advancing reliable robot localization systems capable of interpreting complex, free-form instructions in heterogeneous settings.
Pro-Bench: Prompt-Robust Open-Vocabulary Visual Grounding Across Real-World Heterogeneous Environments
arXiv:2609.27076v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Open-vocabulary visual grounding enables robots to localise task-relevant entities from natural-language queries without dependence on predefined perceptual taxonomies. However, existing benchmarks largely rely on short category labels and web-scraped imagery, leaving it unclear whether open-vocabulary models can robustly ground diverse queries and visual conditions under real deployments. We introduce \textbf{Pro-Bench}, a prompt-conditioned benchmark for open-vocabulary visual grounding in heterogeneous, real-world environments. Pro-Bench includes $13k+$ RGB frames from independent robotic domains (subterranean, industrial, indoor, outdoor, urban), with $74.5k$ manual instance annotations and $515$ target queries covering categorical, attributive, relational, affordance, state, part-whole, negative, and compositional semantics. We benchmarked $16$ open-vocabulary model configurations in strict zero-shot inference, measuring localisation accuracy across IoU thresholds, end-to-end inference latency, prompt-induced performance variation, and target recovery consistency. Our results show that prompt-robustness is strongly architecture-dependent. Most model configurations ($10/16$) perform best with short category labels, whereas free-form queries yield the highest accuracy for only one. Moreover, similar aggregate mAP can conceal substantial differences in consistent target recovery across reformulations. Pro-Bench enables systematic evaluation of these gaps and supports prompt-robust visual grounding. Pro-Bench: https://pro-bench.github.io/.
Abstract:Open-vocabulary visual grounding enables robots to localise task-relevant entities from natural-language queries without dependence on predefined perceptual taxonomies. However, existing benchmarks largely rely on short category labels and web-scraped imagery, leaving it unclear whether open-vocabulary models can robustly ground diverse queries and visual conditions under real deployments. We introduce \textbf{Pro-Bench}, a prompt-conditioned benchmark for open-vocabulary visual grounding in heterogeneous, real-world environments. Pro-Bench includes $13k+$ RGB frames from independent robotic domains (subterranean, industrial, indoor, outdoor, urban), with $74.5k$ manual instance annotations and $515$ target queries covering categorical, attributive, relational, affordance, state, part-whole, negative, and compositional semantics. We benchmarked $16$ open-vocabulary model configurations in strict zero-shot inference, measuring localisation accuracy across IoU thresholds, end-to-end inference latency, prompt-induced performance variation, and target recovery consistency. Our results show that prompt-robustness is strongly architecture-dependent. Most model configurations ($10/16$) perform best with short category labels, whereas free-form queries yield the highest accuracy for only one. Moreover, similar aggregate mAP can conceal substantial differences in consistent target recovery across reformulations. Pro-Bench enables systematic evaluation of these gaps and supports prompt-robust visual grounding. Pro-Bench: this https URL.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.27076 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.27076v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27076 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

[AINews] Claude Opus 5.5, the new default model for AINews — and everybody cuts prices 40-50%
Latent Space · Sep 23, 2026
COMIC: Reference-Aware Safety Gating for Multimodal Large Language Models
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026
Exploratory, Communicative, and Deployable: Vision-Driven Embodied Agents for Open-World Mobile Manipulation
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026