aiqbench analysis
This study introduces PrivacySkills, a framework evaluating how LLM agents select information sources when faced with privacy guidance versus confidential access. The research demonstrates that while system-level instructions alone have limited impact, combining them with skill-level metadata labels can roughly halicit the rate of unauthorized confidential data access. These findings highlight critical vulnerabilities in current agent architectures and underscore the necessity of integrating granular privacy annotations into model specifications to mitigate security risks.
PrivacySkills: How Privacy Guidance Shapes Source Selection in LLM Agents
arXiv:2609.35937v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While prior work has documented privacy failures in LLM agents, it remains unclear how the presentation of privacy guidance influences their choice of information sources. We introduce PrivacySkills, a controlled framework for evaluating how agents choose among acquisition pathways that provide the same task-relevant value: consulting publicly available personal information, accessing confidential sources, or interacting with the user. The evaluation framework comprises 55 synthetic tasks spanning 11 categories of personal information, with 169 associated skills that describe the available acquisition pathways. We consider privacy guidance through system-level instructions, skill-level metadata labels, or both. Separately, we vary user availability and urgency framing. With users available and no privacy guidance, agents access confidential sources in 30% of valid runs on average across five open-weight models, despite sufficient alternatives. This rate increases to 45% when users are unavailable, whereas urgency framing has no detectable effect. System-level privacy instructions alone have limited effects on confidential access, while skill-level intrusiveness labels produce a modest reduction (24% on average), but combining the two roughly halves confidential access. Our findings motivate incorporating privacy annotations into skill specifications and evaluating their effectiveness alongside system-level instructions.
Abstract:While prior work has documented privacy failures in LLM agents, it remains unclear how the presentation of privacy guidance influences their choice of information sources. We introduce PrivacySkills, a controlled framework for evaluating how agents choose among acquisition pathways that provide the same task-relevant value: consulting publicly available personal information, accessing confidential sources, or interacting with the user. The evaluation framework comprises 55 synthetic tasks spanning 11 categories of personal information, with 169 associated skills that describe the available acquisition pathways. We consider privacy guidance through system-level instructions, skill-level metadata labels, or both. Separately, we vary user availability and urgency framing. With users available and no privacy guidance, agents access confidential sources in 30% of valid runs on average across five open-weight models, despite sufficient alternatives. This rate increases to 45% when users are unavailable, whereas urgency framing has no detectable effect. System-level privacy instructions alone have limited effects on confidential access, while skill-level intrusiveness labels produce a modest reduction (24% on average), but combining the two roughly halves confidential access. Our findings motivate incorporating privacy annotations into skill specifications and evaluating their effectiveness alongside system-level instructions.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2609.35937 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2609.35937v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35937 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words
Related coverage

Run Local AI Agents with Faster Models and Multi-Node Clustering on NVIDIA DGX Spark
NVIDIA · Jun 1, 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Jun 1, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026