Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research presents PRISM, an agentic multi-model architecture that shifts autonomous vehicle safety from reactive crash avoidance to proactive risk management using inverse probability modeling and reinforcement learning. By coordinating specialized models for trajectory, environment, and vulnerable road users without dataset-specific retraining, the system dynamically adjusts safety parameters in real-time to reduce near-miss rates. The study validates this approach across diverse urban scenarios, offering an interpretable framework specifically designed to mitigate risks for pedestrians and cyclists in dense traffic environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

PRISM: An Agentic Multi-Model Architecture for Proactive Safety in Autonomous Transportation Systems

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.01623v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous and intelligent transportation systems operate in complex urban environments where safety depends on interactions among vehicle behavior, environmental conditions, and vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists. Most advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) employ reactive mechanisms that activate only after hazards have emerged, a critical limitation underscored by rising VRU fatalities in the United States. This study introduces PRISM (Proactive Risk Intelligence and Safety Management), an agentic multi-model safety architecture that transitions from reactive crash avoidance to proactive, continuous risk management. PRISM employs inverse crash-probability modeling to convert binary crash classifiers into dynamic, interpretable safety scores. Three specialized models addressing trajectory kinematics, environmental risk, and VRU interaction operate concurrently, coordinated by a reasoning layer incorporating reinforcement learning, contextual memory, and feature-level attribution. The system provides graduated safety interventions across four tiers, from silent monitoring to emergency alerts. Unlike rule-based systems with static thresholds, PRISM dynamically adjusts safety parameters in real time. Validated across 1,296 scenarios from three naturalistic driving datasets without dataset-specific retraining, the system yielded a mean safety score of 68 out of 100, classified 77.6% of scenarios as advisory, and flagged a near-miss rate of 3.8%, with 11% of scenarios escalating to intervention or emergency response. Feature attribution consistently identified trajectory risk and VRU proximity as primary safety factors. PRISM provides a unified, interpretable framework for proactive transportation safety with emphasis on VRU risk reduction in dense urban environments.

Abstract:Autonomous and intelligent transportation systems operate in complex urban environments where safety depends on interactions among vehicle behavior, environmental conditions, and vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists. Most advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) employ reactive mechanisms that activate only after hazards have emerged, a critical limitation underscored by rising VRU fatalities in the United States. This study introduces PRISM (Proactive Risk Intelligence and Safety Management), an agentic multi-model safety architecture that transitions from reactive crash avoidance to proactive, continuous risk management. PRISM employs inverse crash-probability modeling to convert binary crash classifiers into dynamic, interpretable safety scores. Three specialized models addressing trajectory kinematics, environmental risk, and VRU interaction operate concurrently, coordinated by a reasoning layer incorporating reinforcement learning, contextual memory, and feature-level attribution. The system provides graduated safety interventions across four tiers, from silent monitoring to emergency alerts. Unlike rule-based systems with static thresholds, PRISM dynamically adjusts safety parameters in real time. Validated across 1,296 scenarios from three naturalistic driving datasets without dataset-specific retraining, the system yielded a mean safety score of 68 out of 100, classified 77.6% of scenarios as advisory, and flagged a near-miss rate of 3.8%, with 11% of scenarios escalating to intervention or emergency response. Feature attribution consistently identified trajectory risk and VRU proximity as primary safety factors. PRISM provides a unified, interpretable framework for proactive transportation safety with emphasis on VRU risk reduction in dense urban environments.

15 pages, 7 figures, 8 tables. Accepted for presentation at ASCE2027: The Infrastructure and Engineering Experience, Philadelphia, PA, March 1-5, 2027. Extends SafeDriver-IQ (arXiv:2603.14841)

Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)

arXiv:2609.01623 [cs.MA]

(or arXiv:2609.01623v1 [cs.MA] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words

Related coverage