aiqbench analysis
This paper evaluates the reasoning capabilities of twelve large language models, including a specialized mental health model called MentaLLaMA, within high-stakes clinical contexts. The study benchmarks performance against human evaluators and analyzes architectural behaviors like attention rollout to ensure safety and reliability in AI-driven healthcare applications.
PRiME: Pragmatic Reasoning In MEntal health
arXiv:2507.23247v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In this work, the task and domain interaction of reasoning and mental health are investigated. As large language models (LLMs) present exceptional text understanding and fluent text generation capability, we analyze whether they can reason in the high-stakes domain of mental health. We begin by introducing three datasets and three tasks leveraging the existing work in pragmatic reasoning. The analysis constitutes an evaluation of $12$ LLMs, including MentaLLaMA, which is a mental health reasoning and explanation generation model. The performance of the models remains on par with human evaluation, with the Mistral-7B model giving the best performance. We further analyze the performance of the models with error asymmetry ratio and conduct first-order attention rollout experiment with MentaLLaMA-7B. We present the results for the community reporting the architectural behaviour of the models for the input text and recommend further careful analysis for the high-stakes domain.
Abstract:In this work, the task and domain interaction of reasoning and mental health are investigated. As large language models (LLMs) present exceptional text understanding and fluent text generation capability, we analyze whether they can reason in the high-stakes domain of mental health. We begin by introducing three datasets and three tasks leveraging the existing work in pragmatic reasoning. The analysis constitutes an evaluation of $12$ LLMs, including MentaLLaMA, which is a mental health reasoning and explanation generation model. The performance of the models remains on par with human evaluation, with the Mistral-7B model giving the best performance. We further analyze the performance of the models with error asymmetry ratio and conduct first-order attention rollout experiment with MentaLLaMA-7B. We present the results for the community reporting the architectural behaviour of the models for the input text and recommend further careful analysis for the high-stakes domain.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2507.23247 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2507.23247v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.23247 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 237 words
Related coverage
PragReST: Self-Reinforcing Counterfactual Reasoning for Pragmatic Language Understanding
arXiv · Oct 19, 2026
Read the Room, Read the Image: Understanding Indirect Speech Acts in Multimodal Visual Contexts
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026
Computational models of pragmatic reasoning with flexible generation of meaning and expression alternatives
arXiv · Jul 22, 2026
Are Large Reasoning Models Good Everyday Reasoners? A Comparison with Non-Reasoning Models on Logical Reasoning Tasks
arXiv · Oct 19, 2026