aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a novel framework for predicting the "price" of post-training quantization configurations by modeling layer-output error covariance and downstream curvature before deployment. By converting various quantization geometries into comparable candidates via a calibration-time price table, the method enables budgeted selection of optimal bit allocations without waiting for full model inference.
Predicting Quantization Price for Selecting PTQ Configurations Before Deployment
arXiv:2609.28270v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Weight-space post-training quantization (PTQ) must choose finite formats, granularities, quantizer families, transformations, and bits before the completed quantized model reveals its output-distribution drift. Existing PTQ methods predict important pieces of this degradation, including reconstruction error, Hessian sensitivity, transformation effects, and downstream loss, but these pieces are usually scored after fixing the quantization geometry or inside separate configuration families. We formulate weight-space PTQ as pre-deployment configuration selection using priced layer-output error. Each admissible layer configuration is treated as an error generator with a deployment cost, which induces a layer-output error covariance $\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_l(\alpha_l)$, and the full-precision model prices that covariance by downstream curvature, $\widehat{\rho}_l(\alpha_l)=\frac{1}{2}\operatorname{Tr}\left(\widehat{\mathbf{H}}_l\,\widehat{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}}_l(\alpha_l)\right)$. The price follows from full-precision-to-quantized forward KL, whose first-order term cancels at the reference model. It turns reconstruction and diagonal scores into reduced proxies that drop price factors, while finite formats, codebooks, granularities, and equivalent transformations become comparable candidates through the covariances they induce and the costs they pay. A trace reduction then yields a calibration-time price table and a budgeted price-guided selector, making fixed-geometry bit allocation a special case rather than the organizing problem.
Abstract:Weight-space post-training quantization (PTQ) must choose finite formats, granularities, quantizer families, transformations, and bits before the completed quantized model reveals its output-distribution drift. Existing PTQ methods predict important pieces of this degradation, including reconstruction error, Hessian sensitivity, transformation effects, and downstream loss, but these pieces are usually scored after fixing the quantization geometry or inside separate configuration families. We formulate weight-space PTQ as pre-deployment configuration selection using priced layer-output error. Each admissible layer configuration is treated as an error generator with a deployment cost, which induces a layer-output error covariance $\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_l(\alpha_l)$, and the full-precision model prices that covariance by downstream curvature, $\widehat{\rho}_l(\alpha_l)=\frac{1}{2}\operatorname{Tr}\left(\widehat{\mathbf{H}}_l\,\widehat{\boldsymbol{\Sigma}}_l(\alpha_l)\right)$. The price follows from full-precision-to-quantized forward KL, whose first-order term cancels at the reference model. It turns reconstruction and diagonal scores into reduced proxies that drop price factors, while finite formats, codebooks, granularities, and equivalent transformations become comparable candidates through the covariances they induce and the costs they pay. A trace reduction then yields a calibration-time price table and a budgeted price-guided selector, making fixed-geometry bit allocation a special case rather than the organizing problem.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.28270 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.28270v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28270 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

End-to-end encrypted ML inference with Amazon SageMaker AI and FHE
AWS · Jun 8, 2026

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: The AI Agent Workhorse
Analytics Vidhya · Aug 14, 2026