aiqbench analysis
This preprint reframes mental health help-seeking prediction as a time-to-event problem, using censored cohorts and temporal holdouts to reduce leakage. Its headline result is that behavioural activity features predict *who* will seek help better than text, while text is more useful for *when*. Readers should note that these are retrospective Reddit-based associations, not validated clinical tools, and that the gains depend on a specific cohort design and evaluation setup.
Predicting Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviour on Reddit: A Survival Analysis of Linguistic and Behavioural Signals
arXiv:2610.16983v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most prior work on predicting mental health help-seeking treats it as post-hoc classification of users already active in clinical communities, which cannot tell whether someone approaching a transition can be identified in advance. We instead frame help-seeking as a time-to-event problem and ask which Reddit users will eventually seek mental health support, and how imminent that transition is. We build a two-arm cohort: a control frame of 6,337 ordinary users with genuine right-censoring (12.1% transition rate) to answer who will transition, and a clinical frame of 5,023 eventual transitioners to answer how soon. Features come only from posts written before any clinical activity, and user-grouped five-fold cross-validation plus a four-year temporal holdout guard against leakage. We compare TF-IDF, MentalBERT embeddings and behavioural activity features using Cox proportional hazards models, Random Survival Forests and an LSTM sequential model. Behavioural features alone outperform text for predicting who will seek help (C-index 0.797 vs. 0.763), and combining both is best (0.823 under cross-validation, 0.856 on the holdout). The pattern reverses for predicting how soon a known transition will happen: text remains a stable predictor (C-index 0.698) while behavioural features become unstable. Structural engagement patterns therefore carry information about future help-seeking beyond linguistic content, and separating who from when yields a cleaner analysis.
Abstract:Most prior work on predicting mental health help-seeking treats it as post-hoc classification of users already active in clinical communities, which cannot tell whether someone approaching a transition can be identified in advance. We instead frame help-seeking as a time-to-event problem and ask which Reddit users will eventually seek mental health support, and how imminent that transition is. We build a two-arm cohort: a control frame of 6,337 ordinary users with genuine right-censoring (12.1% transition rate) to answer who will transition, and a clinical frame of 5,023 eventual transitioners to answer how soon. Features come only from posts written before any clinical activity, and user-grouped five-fold cross-validation plus a four-year temporal holdout guard against leakage. We compare TF-IDF, MentalBERT embeddings and behavioural activity features using Cox proportional hazards models, Random Survival Forests and an LSTM sequential model. Behavioural features alone outperform text for predicting who will seek help (C-index 0.797 vs. 0.763), and combining both is best (0.823 under cross-validation, 0.856 on the holdout). The pattern reverses for predicting how soon a known transition will happen: text remains a stable predictor (C-index 0.698) while behavioural features become unstable. Structural engagement patterns therefore carry information about future help-seeking beyond linguistic content, and separating who from when yields a cleaner analysis.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
arXiv:2610.16983 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.16983v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16983 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words
Related coverage
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · Jul 19, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026
Construct validity of Claude Opus 4.8's System Card – A commentary
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026