aiqbench analysis
This paper refines the theoretical bounds for clipped stochastic gradient descent, offering tighter convergence constants and extending the valid learning rate domain to match traditional smooth function analysis. By simplifying proof structures around $\ell_2$-projection properties, it provides a more precise characterization of achievable loss in non-convex optimization settings. These advances directly benefit researchers developing robust training algorithms for large-scale machine learning models where gradient clipping is standard practice.
Precise Convergence Speed of Clipped SGD
arXiv:2609.29458v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a tightened convergence analysis of clipped gradient descent on $(L_0, L_1)$-smooth functions, with quantitative constants. Building on the ideas of Koloskova et al (2023), we refactor several case disjunctions to reveal the central role of a control of the bias derived from fundamental properties of $\ell_2$-projection, simplifying proofs. We also extend the domain of validity from $\eta \leq 1 / (9 \beta)$ to $\eta < 1 /\beta$ where $\beta = L_0 + c L_1$ for clipping constant $c$, which matches the more traditional analysis of smooth functions. We strengthen the convergence criterion from $\left( \min_{t < T} \mathbb{E}[\lVert \nabla f(x_t) \rVert_2] \right)$ to $\left( \frac{1}{T} \sum_{t < T} \mathbb{E}[\lVert \nabla f(x_t) \rVert_2] \right)$ with matching speed, and lower the final achievable loss from $\mathcal{O}(\min(\sigma^2/c, \sigma))$ to the more precise $6 \min(\sigma^2 /c, 3 \sigma)$.
Abstract:We present a tightened convergence analysis of clipped gradient descent on $(L_0, L_1)$-smooth functions, with quantitative constants. Building on the ideas of Koloskova et al (2023), we refactor several case disjunctions to reveal the central role of a control of the bias derived from fundamental properties of $\ell_2$-projection, simplifying proofs. We also extend the domain of validity from $\eta \leq 1 / (9 \beta)$ to $\eta < 1 /\beta$ where $\beta = L_0 + c L_1$ for clipping constant $c$, which matches the more traditional analysis of smooth functions. We strengthen the convergence criterion from $\left( \min_{t < T} \mathbb{E}[\lVert \nabla f(x_t) \rVert_2] \right)$ to $\left( \frac{1}{T} \sum_{t < T} \mathbb{E}[\lVert \nabla f(x_t) \rVert_2] \right)$ with matching speed, and lower the final achievable loss from $\mathcal{O}(\min(\sigma^2/c, \sigma))$ to the more precise $6 \min(\sigma^2 /c, 3 \sigma)$.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2609.29458 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.29458v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29458 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

Import AI 474: Platonic mindspace; TPUs in space; Zhipu starts an outer RSI loop
Import AI · Sep 28, 2026

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · Aug 3, 2026
Decentralized SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noise: Optimal Convergence Rates and the Role of Gradient Clipping
arXiv · Oct 8, 2026