Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

PRAXIS introduces a co-evolutionary framework where generators, learners, and symbolic archives interact as dynamical processes to handle nonstationary objectives in self-improving systems. Theoretical proofs bound objective drift through KL-constrained updates and archive-weight movements, while experiments demonstrate improved stability in visual robustness and graph reasoning tasks. This work advances the understanding of how auxiliary symbolic components can stabilize learning dynamics beyond standard stationary assumptions.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

PRAXIS: Learning Dynamics of Self-Improving Models with Symbolic Archives

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.11803v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-improving learning systems adapt data selection, optimization, and auxiliary symbolic components, inducing nonstationary objectives outside standard learning assumptions. We introduce \textsc{PRAXIS}, a co-evolutionary framework that models generators, learners, and symbolic archives as interacting dynamical processes. We prove that KL-constrained generator updates and controlled archive-weight movement bound one-step objective drift, that archive updates suppress a program relative to any fixed comparator with a persistent cumulative utility advantage under sub-Gaussian noise, and that stochastic gradient descent achieves an average-stationarity guarantee whose degradation is governed by cumulative objective drift. Experiments across visual robustness, relational graph reasoning, and algorithmic graph reasoning exhibit generator stabilization, decreasing learner loss, and archive concentration consistent with these theoretical mechanisms.

Abstract:Self-improving learning systems adapt data selection, optimization, and auxiliary symbolic components, inducing nonstationary objectives outside standard learning assumptions. We introduce \textsc{PRAXIS}, a co-evolutionary framework that models generators, learners, and symbolic archives as interacting dynamical processes. We prove that KL-constrained generator updates and controlled archive-weight movement bound one-step objective drift, that archive updates suppress a program relative to any fixed comparator with a persistent cumulative utility advantage under sub-Gaussian noise, and that stochastic gradient descent achieves an average-stationarity guarantee whose degradation is governed by cumulative objective drift. Experiments across visual robustness, relational graph reasoning, and algorithmic graph reasoning exhibit generator stabilization, decreasing learner loss, and archive concentration consistent with these theoretical mechanisms.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.11803 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.11803v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11803 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 205 words

Related coverage