aiqbench analysis
This paper models how to place quantum signals on wavelengths that share fiber with classical traffic, using an error-corrected three-stage protocol with idealized receivers and recovery. Its main finding is that the wavelength that maximizes logical fidelity (near 1537 nm) differs from the one that maximizes the yield bound (near 1551 nm), so operators face a real tradeoff. Readers should note that the results depend on idealized assumptions and a thermal-background noise model, so they are a certified design framework, not a demonstrated deployment.
Practical wavelength selection for quantum-augmented networks over shared optical fiber
arXiv:2610.20987v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In a quantum augmented network, sharing optical fiber with classical traffic requires quantum wavelength selection to balance logical fidelity, block acceptance, and classical data reception. Here we develop a wavelength-selection framework for an error-corrected three-stage quantum communication protocol. Under a thermal-background model with independent errors, an ideal one-photon receiver, and ideal recovery, we derive an accepted qubit channel and a key-independent lower bound on logical entanglement fidelity. Combining this bound with block acceptance gives an entanglement-fidelity yield bound, which we maximize over evaluated wavelengths subject to fidelity and classical link-budget requirements. For the Steane [[7,1,3]] code at 5 km per traversal and -10 dBm per classical channel, the largest fidelity certificate occurs near 1537 nm, whereas the largest yield bound occurs near 1551 nm. Along the 1.25 Gb/s classical link budget with 0.2% base error, the optimized yield bound falls below 10^-6 near 10 km per traversal, while fidelity remains certified at 0.99 or higher at longer spans. These results distinguish fidelity and yield constraints and identify certified operating regions for quantum-augmented networks sharing optical fiber.
Abstract:In a quantum augmented network, sharing optical fiber with classical traffic requires quantum wavelength selection to balance logical fidelity, block acceptance, and classical data reception. Here we develop a wavelength-selection framework for an error-corrected three-stage quantum communication protocol. Under a thermal-background model with independent errors, an ideal one-photon receiver, and ideal recovery, we derive an accepted qubit channel and a key-independent lower bound on logical entanglement fidelity. Combining this bound with block acceptance gives an entanglement-fidelity yield bound, which we maximize over evaluated wavelengths subject to fidelity and classical link-budget requirements. For the Steane [[7,1,3]] code at 5 km per traversal and -10 dBm per classical channel, the largest fidelity certificate occurs near 1537 nm, whereas the largest yield bound occurs near 1551 nm. Along the 1.25 Gb/s classical link budget with 0.2% base error, the optimized yield bound falls below 10^-6 near 10 km per traversal, while fidelity remains certified at 0.99 or higher at longer spans. These results distinguish fidelity and yield constraints and identify certified operating regions for quantum-augmented networks sharing optical fiber.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)
arXiv:2610.20987 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.20987v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20987 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

How Photonic Chips Differ From Electronic Chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 19, 2026

France deploys a quantum key distribution network
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 30, 2026