aiqbench analysis
This research tackles the classical-to-quantum I/O bottleneck by analyzing Quantum Oracle Sketching (QOS) on current hardware limitations. The study highlights that while the method converges with few samples, existing compiled circuits are too deep for near-term devices, necessitating lower-depth oracle synthesis and interactive runtimes.
Practical Considerations for Processing Massive Classical Data via Quantum Oracle Sketching
arXiv:2609.13549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Classical-to-quantum I/O is a critical bottleneck for data-intensive quantum workloads. Quantum Oracle Sketching (QOS) has been proposed to address this problem. We identify its practical requirements, including the representation of data as a probability distribution over oracle addresses, the relation between sample count, approximation error, and update cost, and the coherence and runtime support required for online execution. To study QOS on current quantum computing devices, we develop an offline realization that compiles sample blocks into empirical phase oracles and evaluate it using DNA fingerprinting. The application converges with relatively few samples, while exact phase fusion combines repeated updates to the same address. However, the compiled circuits remain too deep for current quantum computing devices. Practical QOS therefore requires lower depth oracle synthesis and interactive quantum runtimes.
Abstract:Classical-to-quantum I/O is a critical bottleneck for data-intensive quantum workloads. Quantum Oracle Sketching (QOS) has been proposed to address this problem. We identify its practical requirements, including the representation of data as a probability distribution over oracle addresses, the relation between sample count, approximation error, and update cost, and the coherence and runtime support required for online execution. To study QOS on current quantum computing devices, we develop an offline realization that compiles sample blocks into empirical phase oracles and evaluate it using DNA fingerprinting. The application converges with relatively few samples, while exact phase fusion combines repeated updates to the same address. However, the compiled circuits remain too deep for current quantum computing devices. Practical QOS therefore requires lower depth oracle synthesis and interactive quantum runtimes.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET)
arXiv:2609.13549 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.13549v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13549 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 224 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

David E. Shaw, The Quant Who Returned To Building Computers
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 30, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Ernest Rutherford, The Man Who Found The Nucleus
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 5, 2026