aiqbench analysis
This research resolves a longstanding question regarding the efficiency of discriminating orthogonal quantum states across multiple copies in distributed settings. The study establishes that while collective local processing significantly reduces copy complexity for specific stabilizer bases, it does not eliminate fundamental hardness limits where sample requirements scale with system size. These findings clarify the distinct resources required for distributed quantum measurement, offering critical insights into the theoretical boundaries of scalable quantum protocols.
Power and Limits of Collective Local Measurements in Multicopy State Discrimination
arXiv:2609.07233v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: More than two decades ago, Bennett \emph{et al.} [Phys. Rev. A \textbf{59}, 1070 (1999)] asked whether perfect local discrimination of orthogonal quantum states can require more than two copies. This question was subsequently answered for adaptive protocols that process the copies separately [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{126}, 210505 (2021)], but remained open when each laboratory is allowed to process its local copies collectively. Here we resolve this stronger setting and identify collective access across repeated local inputs as a distinct resource. For every fixed odd-prime local dimension, there exist complete maximal-stabilizer eigenbases whose copy complexity under individual-copy separable measurements diverges with system size. Under collective processing this behavior changes sharply: every maximal-stabilizer eigenbasis in odd-prime local dimension is perfectly decoded by one-round collective LOCC using at most three copies. Collective processing, however, does not remove multicopy hardness in general. For every fixed local dimension $d\ge2$, we prove the existence, within an explicit phase family, of complete bases whose copy complexity remains unbounded even under collective separable measurements, with a square root of the number of subsystems as lower-bound scale. Thus sample number, spatial measurement power, and coherent access across repeated local inputs are distinct resources in distributed quantum measurement.
Abstract:More than two decades ago, Bennett \emph{et al.} [Phys. Rev. A \textbf{59}, 1070 (1999)] asked whether perfect local discrimination of orthogonal quantum states can require more than two copies. This question was subsequently answered for adaptive protocols that process the copies separately [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{126}, 210505 (2021)], but remained open when each laboratory is allowed to process its local copies collectively. Here we resolve this stronger setting and identify collective access across repeated local inputs as a distinct resource. For every fixed odd-prime local dimension, there exist complete maximal-stabilizer eigenbases whose copy complexity under individual-copy separable measurements diverges with system size. Under collective processing this behavior changes sharply: every maximal-stabilizer eigenbasis in odd-prime local dimension is perfectly decoded by one-round collective LOCC using at most three copies. Collective processing, however, does not remove multicopy hardness in general. For every fixed local dimension $d\ge2$, we prove the existence, within an explicit phase family, of complete bases whose copy complexity remains unbounded even under collective separable measurements, with a square root of the number of subsystems as lower-bound scale. Thus sample number, spatial measurement power, and coherent access across repeated local inputs are distinct resources in distributed quantum measurement.
arXiv:2609.07233 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.07233v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07233 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 289 words
Related coverage

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Frontier Risk Report (February to March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026