aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Post-Rejection Follow-up Sampling (PRFS), a methodology that measures the actual market outcomes of rejected algorithmic trading candidates rather than relying on synthetic backtests. By tracking price and liquidity changes over a 24-hour horizon, the approach provides a dataset-independent framework for evaluating filter precision in systems where rejections significantly outnumber executions. This shift from simulated to empirical counterfactual data addresses a critical gap in validating decision filters for decentralized exchange trading algorithms.
Post-Rejection Follow-up Sampling: A Methodology for Counterfactual Outcome Measurement in Algorithmic DEX Trading
arXiv:2606.08228v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Algorithmic trading systems on decentralised exchanges (DEXs) reject most candidate tokens they evaluate. The counterfactual outcome of rejected candidates (what would have happened had the system entered) is rarely measured. This paper introduces Post-Rejection Follow-up Sampling (PRFS). A separate tracking subsystem samples each rejected token's price and liquidity at a configurable cadence, over a horizon of up to twenty-four hours. PRFS produces the data needed to evaluate filter precision against actual market outcomes of rejected candidates, not against synthetic backtest reconstructions. The methodology, data architecture, and deposit format are described in Section III. The companion dataset contains 67,000 forward-outcome observation rows across 2,997 rejection events spanning 457 unique mints, collected over a continuous eight-day window (2026-04-10 to 2026-04-19, UTC). Approximately 55 percent of rejection events receive at least one forward observation; coverage at the mint level is complete. The principal binding constraint on downstream classification is per-event horizon density, not event-level coverage. PRFS is dataset-independent. It generalises to any algorithmic decision system in which rejections substantially outnumber executions.
Abstract:Algorithmic trading systems on decentralised exchanges (DEXs) reject most candidate tokens they evaluate. The counterfactual outcome of rejected candidates (what would have happened had the system entered) is rarely measured. This paper introduces Post-Rejection Follow-up Sampling (PRFS). A separate tracking subsystem samples each rejected token's price and liquidity at a configurable cadence, over a horizon of up to twenty-four hours. PRFS produces the data needed to evaluate filter precision against actual market outcomes of rejected candidates, not against synthetic backtest reconstructions. The methodology, data architecture, and deposit format are described in Section III. The companion dataset contains 67,000 forward-outcome observation rows across 2,997 rejection events spanning 457 unique mints, collected over a continuous eight-day window (2026-04-10 to 2026-04-19, UTC). Approximately 55 percent of rejection events receive at least one forward observation; coverage at the mint level is complete. The principal binding constraint on downstream classification is per-event horizon density, not event-level coverage. PRFS is dataset-independent. It generalises to any algorithmic decision system in which rejections substantially outnumber executions.
12 pages. Companion methodology paper to RED-2400 (arXiv:2605.12151). Currently under review at Ledger. SSRN abstract ID 6607301. Zenodo concept DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20043516
Trading and Market Microstructure (q-fin.TR); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Finance (q-fin.CP); Statistical Finance (q-fin.ST)
arXiv:2606.08228 [q-fin.TR]
(or arXiv:2606.08228v1 [q-fin.TR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.08228 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20043516 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 304 words
Related coverage
Post-Rejection Follow-up Sampling: Measuring Outcomes of Rejected Decisions in Algorithmic DEX Trading
arXiv · Sep 21, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026