aiqbench analysis
This position paper addresses the critical crisis of irreproducibility in machine learning research, proposing concrete frameworks to enhance result verifiability when full reproducibility remains technically unfeasible. By shifting focus from perfect replication to rigorous checkability and code availability, the authors aim to restore integrity and accelerate progress within the AI community. This work is essential for researchers navigating the growing gap between claimed performance metrics and empirical reality in deep learning.
Position: Let's Strengthen Verifiability If We Can't Enforce Reproducibility
arXiv:2609.35854v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In the field of Machine Learning, many papers contain empirical results supporting claimed statements or illustrating the performance of a proposed method. However, most practitioners know that (1) results are generally hard to reproduce, and increasingly so, (2) code is not often available to do so, and (3) it hinders the development of research. In this position paper, we analyze and quantify these issues, and make concrete proposals to improve result checkability, if not reproducibility. Code and supporting materials are available at https://github.com/giddyyupp/position-enforce-verifiability.
Abstract:In the field of Machine Learning, many papers contain empirical results supporting claimed statements or illustrating the performance of a proposed method. However, most practitioners know that (1) results are generally hard to reproduce, and increasingly so, (2) code is not often available to do so, and (3) it hinders the development of research. In this position paper, we analyze and quantify these issues, and make concrete proposals to improve result checkability, if not reproducibility. Code and supporting materials are available at this https URL.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2609.35854 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.35854v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35854 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 184 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Building an Enterprise AI Customer Support Platform with Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Code
Analytics Vidhya · Oct 5, 2026