Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical security vulnerability in Federated Learning where malicious orchestrators induce targeted overfitting to compromise specific clients. The authors propose practical client-side detection mechanisms—such as label flipping and model fingerprinting—that can identify these attacks within one or two training rounds, enabling early disengagement before data integrity is severely compromised. These findings are essential for advancing the trustworthiness of privacy-preserving machine learning systems in real-world deployments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Poison to Detect: Detection of Targeted Overfitting in Federated Learning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2509.11974v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training among clients without centralising data, making it a widely adopted privacy-enhancing technology (PET). Despite its privacy benefits, FL remains vulnerable to orchestrator-driven privacy attacks. In this paper, we study an underexplored threat in which a dishonest orchestrator intentionally manipulates the aggregation process to induce targeted overfitting in local models of specific clients. Although prior work focuses on reducing information leakage during training, we emphasise early client-side detection of targeted overfitting, allowing clients to disengage before significant harm occurs. To this end, we propose three detection techniques -- label flipping, backdoor trigger injection, and model fingerprinting -- which enable clients to verify the integrity of the global aggregation. We evaluated our methods across multiple datasets and attack scenarios. In single-client attacks, all three methods detect orchestrator-induced overfitting within 1-2 training rounds with F1 scores up to 0.7. Scalability experiments further show that detection effectiveness is influenced by cohort composition and method parameters. These results demonstrate that client-side integrity testing can provide early, effective, and scalable detection, supporting safer deployment of FL systems.

Abstract:Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training among clients without centralising data, making it a widely adopted privacy-enhancing technology (PET). Despite its privacy benefits, FL remains vulnerable to orchestrator-driven privacy attacks. In this paper, we study an underexplored threat in which a dishonest orchestrator intentionally manipulates the aggregation process to induce targeted overfitting in local models of specific clients. Although prior work focuses on reducing information leakage during training, we emphasise early client-side detection of targeted overfitting, allowing clients to disengage before significant harm occurs. To this end, we propose three detection techniques -- label flipping, backdoor trigger injection, and model fingerprinting -- which enable clients to verify the integrity of the global aggregation. We evaluated our methods across multiple datasets and attack scenarios. In single-client attacks, all three methods detect orchestrator-induced overfitting within 1-2 training rounds with F1 scores up to 0.7. Scalability experiments further show that detection effectiveness is influenced by cohort composition and method parameters. These results demonstrate that client-side integrity testing can provide early, effective, and scalable detection, supporting safer deployment of FL systems.

Published in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PoPETs), 2026. 27 pages, 20 figures. First co-authors: Soumia Zohra El Mestari, Maciej Krzysztof Zuziak. Corresponding authors: Soumia Zohra El Mestari, Maciej Krzysztof Zuziak

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

K.4.1; I.2.6; K.6.5

arXiv:2509.11974 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2509.11974v3 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2026-0131 DOI(s) linking to related resources

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 233 words

Related coverage