aiqbench analysis
This study presents a resource-efficient approach to pluralistic value alignment by fine-tuning Llama 3.1 with QLoRA across three distinct linguistic contexts. The methodology demonstrates how data augmentation and threshold calibration can significantly improve model accuracy in low-resource settings, offering practical insights for deploying aligned models globally.
PlurVA-LLM-2026 Shared Task Track-1: Pluralistic Value Alignment in LLMs via Multilingual Fine-Tuning and Threshold Calibration
arXiv:2609.32382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present our system for the PlurVA-LLM 2026 Shared Task Track-1, which focuses on pluralistic value alignment in the contexts of China, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka. For this resource-constrained track, we fine-tuned Llama 3.1 8B Instruct using 4-bit QLoRA. Our approach combines option-permutation augmentation for Chinese data, annotator vote expansion for Indonesian data, and binary reformulation with SinhalaMMLU augmentation for Sri Lankan data. We further applied conditional threshold calibration to the predictions for the Sri Lankan data. The final system achieved accuracies of 0.785 for Chinese, 0.715 for Indonesian, and 0.916 for Sri Lankan, resulting in an overall macro-average accuracy of 0.805.
Abstract:We present our system for the PlurVA-LLM 2026 Shared Task Track-1, which focuses on pluralistic value alignment in the contexts of China, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka. For this resource-constrained track, we fine-tuned Llama 3.1 8B Instruct using 4-bit QLoRA. Our approach combines option-permutation augmentation for Chinese data, annotator vote expansion for Indonesian data, and binary reformulation with SinhalaMMLU augmentation for Sri Lankan data. We further applied conditional threshold calibration to the predictions for the Sri Lankan data. The final system achieved accuracies of 0.785 for Chinese, 0.715 for Indonesian, and 0.916 for Sri Lankan, resulting in an overall macro-average accuracy of 0.805.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.32382 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.32382v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32382 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 197 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

The world's best gradual disempowerment model organism: Frontier AI labs
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026