Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates that off-the-shelf persona vectors can effectively mitigate sycophancy while preserving model accuracy, offering a simpler alternative to the standard Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) method. The findings suggest that sycophancy functions as a persona-level property rather than a single steerable direction, challenging previous assumptions about activation space geometry. For practitioners, this implies that general role-playing vectors may be sufficient for bias reduction without requiring specialized training on sycophantic data pairs.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Playing Devil's Advocate: Off-the-Shelf Persona Vectors Rival Targeted Steering for Sycophancy

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.21006v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study the effect of different persona on \textbf{sycophancy}: model's agreement with users even when the user is incorrect. The standard mitigation, Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA), derives a steering direction from labelled pairs of sycophantic and honest responses. This study evaluates whether off-the-shelf persona steering vectors, originally developed for general role-playing and not trained on sycophancy data, can serve as an alternative. In two instruction-tuned models, steering toward personas characterised by doubt or scrutiny reduces sycophancy to approximately $68\%$ and $98\%$ of CAA's effect, and, unlike CAA, maintains accuracy when the user is correct. The effect is also asymmetric: steering toward agreeable personas does not produce a mirror increase in sycophancy. Geometrically, the persona vector is largely independent of the direction of sycophancy in activation space. Collectively, these findings suggest that sycophancy is better understood as a persona-level property rather than a single steerable direction. We release our code here: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Sycophancy-Steering-9DF0/.

Abstract:We study the effect of different persona on \textbf{sycophancy}: model's agreement with users even when the user is incorrect. The standard mitigation, Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA), derives a steering direction from labelled pairs of sycophantic and honest responses. This study evaluates whether off-the-shelf persona steering vectors, originally developed for general role-playing and not trained on sycophancy data, can serve as an alternative. In two instruction-tuned models, steering toward personas characterised by doubt or scrutiny reduces sycophancy to approximately $68\%$ and $98\%$ of CAA's effect, and, unlike CAA, maintains accuracy when the user is correct. The effect is also asymmetric: steering toward agreeable personas does not produce a mirror increase in sycophancy. Geometrically, the persona vector is largely independent of the direction of sycophancy in activation space. Collectively, these findings suggest that sycophancy is better understood as a persona-level property rather than a single steerable direction. We release our code here: this https URL.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2605.21006 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.21006v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21006 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words

Related coverage