Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces PLayer-FL, a method for cross-silo federated learning that systematically identifies which neural network layers are safe to aggregate versus those requiring local training. By deriving a federation-sensitivity metric based on generalization dynamics rather than architecture-specific heuristics, the approach mitigates performance degradation in non-IID data scenarios while distributing gains more equitably across clients.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

PLayer-FL: A Principled Approach to Personalized Layer-wise Cross-Silo Federated Learning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2502.08829v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning (FL) with non-IID data often degrades client performance below local training baselines. Partial FL addresses this by federating only early layers that learn transferable features, but existing methods rely on ad-hoc, architecture-specific heuristics. We first conduct a systematic analysis of layer-wise generalization dynamics in FL, revealing an early-emerging transition between generalizable (safe-to-federate) and task-specific (should-remain-local) layers. Building on this, we introduce Principled Layer-wise Federated Learning (PLayer-FL), which aims to deliver the benefits of federation more robustly. PLayer-FL computes a novel federation-sensitivity metric efficiently after a single training epoch to choose the optimal split point for a given task. Inspired by model pruning, the metric quantifies each layer's robustness to aggregation and highlights where federation shifts from beneficial to detrimental. We show that this metric correlates strongly with established generalization measures across diverse architectures. Crucially, experiments demonstrate that PLayer-FL achieves consistently competitive performance across a wide range of tasks while distributing gains more equitably and reducing client-side regressions relative to baselines.

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) with non-IID data often degrades client performance below local training baselines. Partial FL addresses this by federating only early layers that learn transferable features, but existing methods rely on ad-hoc, architecture-specific heuristics. We first conduct a systematic analysis of layer-wise generalization dynamics in FL, revealing an early-emerging transition between generalizable (safe-to-federate) and task-specific (should-remain-local) layers. Building on this, we introduce Principled Layer-wise Federated Learning (PLayer-FL), which aims to deliver the benefits of federation more robustly. PLayer-FL computes a novel federation-sensitivity metric efficiently after a single training epoch to choose the optimal split point for a given task. Inspired by model pruning, the metric quantifies each layer's robustness to aggregation and highlights where federation shifts from beneficial to detrimental. We show that this metric correlates strongly with established generalization measures across diverse architectures. Crucially, experiments demonstrate that PLayer-FL achieves consistently competitive performance across a wide range of tasks while distributing gains more equitably and reducing client-side regressions relative to baselines.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2502.08829 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2502.08829v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.08829 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words

Related coverage