aiqbench analysis
This research advances robotic motion planning by intentionally utilizing controlled collisions with walls to reduce actuation effort and execution time for high-inertia robots. By constructing a reflection-augmented state graph, the authors demonstrate that leveraging environmental interactions can yield more efficient trajectories than traditional collision-free avoidance methods. The study highlights a significant shift in robotics algorithms toward dynamic strategies that safely exploit physical contact rather than strictly preventing it.
Planning Trajectories that Bounce: Reflection Classes for Collision-Tolerant Robots
arXiv:2609.27145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robot navigation methods tend to avoid contact, and consequently search for collision-free trajectories. For robots with high inertia and limited maneuverability, however, avoiding contact can require substantial steering effort and time, even when interactions with surrounding surfaces could be safely exploited. In this paper, we develop a planning method that deliberately uses controlled wall reflections to generate trajectories that can be easier and more efficient to execute than purely collision-free motion. We consider planar navigation in environments where a mobile robot is permitted to bounce off surrounding surfaces. To represent the resulting alternatives, we construct a reflection-augmented state graph in which paths are partitioned into distinct classes according to the sequence of walls used for reflection. This representation enables systematic enumeration of reflection strategies and identification of the lowest-cost path within each class. We show that, although a reflecting path cannot be shorter than the shortest collision-free path, it can reduce execution time and actuation effort by replacing costly changes in heading with controlled environmental interactions. The planned trajectories are executed using a contact-aware sampling-based controller with the robot's full dynamics. In our experiments, we demonstrate that in our simulated test scenario, the best reflecting class can reduce time and control effort. Our results show that controlled contact can provide dynamically advantageous navigation strategies that are excluded by conventional collision-avoidance formulations.
Abstract:Robot navigation methods tend to avoid contact, and consequently search for collision-free trajectories. For robots with high inertia and limited maneuverability, however, avoiding contact can require substantial steering effort and time, even when interactions with surrounding surfaces could be safely exploited. In this paper, we develop a planning method that deliberately uses controlled wall reflections to generate trajectories that can be easier and more efficient to execute than purely collision-free motion. We consider planar navigation in environments where a mobile robot is permitted to bounce off surrounding surfaces. To represent the resulting alternatives, we construct a reflection-augmented state graph in which paths are partitioned into distinct classes according to the sequence of walls used for reflection. This representation enables systematic enumeration of reflection strategies and identification of the lowest-cost path within each class. We show that, although a reflecting path cannot be shorter than the shortest collision-free path, it can reduce execution time and actuation effort by replacing costly changes in heading with controlled environmental interactions. The planned trajectories are executed using a contact-aware sampling-based controller with the robot's full dynamics. In our experiments, we demonstrate that in our simulated test scenario, the best reflecting class can reduce time and control effort. Our results show that controlled contact can provide dynamically advantageous navigation strategies that are excluded by conventional collision-avoidance formulations.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.27145 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.27145v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27145 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 314 words
Related coverage
Grasp Execution Without a Planner: Configuration-Space Grasp Distance Fields with Certified Safety & Guaranteed Quality
arXiv · Aug 4, 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Frontier Risk Report (February to March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026