Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates a hardware-aware calibration strategy that learns compact error models from limited transmon measurements to significantly improve QAOA reliability. By utilizing local affine Bloch response maps and pair probes, the study achieves a tenfold reduction in landscape errors without relying on full tomography or neural networks. The findings highlight how measurement-efficient diagnostics can directly enhance variational algorithm performance on noisy quantum hardware.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Physics-Informed Learning of Effective Error Processes from Limited Noisy Transmon Measurements for Robust QAOA Reliability

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2606.00353v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study whether limited finite-shot calibration measurements from a hidden transmon-inspired simulator can be used to learn compact, task-relevant effective error models for variational-algorithm reliability. Each physical element is modeled as a weakly anharmonic qutrit with coherent control imperfections, dissipation, dephasing, leakage, readout assignment error, and sampling noise, while the learner receives only selected local tomography data and, in the three-qubit extension, targeted pair probes. The learned objects are local affine Bloch response maps supplemented by process-relative edge residuals, and they are tested through their ability to reproduce and mitigate deformations of QAOA/MaxCut cost landscapes in simulation. The results show that strongly incomplete local data can still support useful response-map inference, that regularized linear models become competitive with neural networks in the scaled three-qubit setting, and that pair probes provide useful edge-level information, giving the clearest edge-residual prediction gain at the full pair-probe budget and a measurable downstream QAOA benefit. In the best non-oracle test, a Clifford-data-regression-style local-inverse correction reduces the finite-shot QAOA landscape error from $0.18187\,[0.17576,0.18798]$ to $0.01811\,[0.01751,0.01871]$, corresponding to a $10\times$ improvement. The study supports a hardware-aware, measurement-efficient calibration strategy, while incorporating leakage-explicit diagnostics and a non-oracle regression-style correction.

Abstract:We study whether limited finite-shot calibration measurements from a hidden transmon-inspired simulator can be used to learn compact, task-relevant effective error models for variational-algorithm reliability. Each physical element is modeled as a weakly anharmonic qutrit with coherent control imperfections, dissipation, dephasing, leakage, readout assignment error, and sampling noise, while the learner receives only selected local tomography data and, in the three-qubit extension, targeted pair probes. The learned objects are local affine Bloch response maps supplemented by process-relative edge residuals, and they are tested through their ability to reproduce and mitigate deformations of QAOA/MaxCut cost landscapes in simulation. The results show that strongly incomplete local data can still support useful response-map inference, that regularized linear models become competitive with neural networks in the scaled three-qubit setting, and that pair probes provide useful edge-level information, giving the clearest edge-residual prediction gain at the full pair-probe budget and a measurable downstream QAOA benefit. In the best non-oracle test, a Clifford-data-regression-style local-inverse correction reduces the finite-shot QAOA landscape error from $0.18187\,[0.17576,0.18798]$ to $0.01811\,[0.01751,0.01871]$, corresponding to a $10\times$ improvement. The study supports a hardware-aware, measurement-efficient calibration strategy, while incorporating leakage-explicit diagnostics and a non-oracle regression-style correction.

arXiv:2606.00353 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2606.00353v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.00353 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words

Related coverage