aiqbench analysis
PhysElite introduces a rigorous, bilingual multimodal benchmark featuring over 11,000 Olympiad-level physics problems to better evaluate the reasoning limits of current large language models. The study reveals that even state-of-the-art MLLMs achieve only 33.7% accuracy on these expert-tier tasks, highlighting significant gaps in visual interpretation and step-by-step derivation capabilities. This dataset provides a critical baseline for researchers aiming to advance AI's ability to handle complex scientific reasoning rather than simple pattern matching.
PhysElite: How Far Are LLMs from Solving Olympiad-Level Physics Problems?
arXiv:2608.25097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding how (multimodal) large language models perform on physics problems requires benchmarks that reflect the difficulty and breadth of expert-level physical reasoning. Existing physics benchmarks remain limited in the following two important ways: (1) short of high-difficulty datasets, and (2) lack of comprehensive coverage of visual forms, knowledge points, and step-by-step solution processes. As a result, model performance on current datasets may not be fully representative of their ability to solve complex physics problems. To address these issues, we present PhysElite, a large-scale bilingual multimodal benchmark for Olympiad-level physics reasoning. PhysElite contains 11,586 Olympiad-tier problems. For each problem, we provide corresponding visual diagrams, step-by-step bilingual Chinese-English solution derivations, and the final answer. We benchmark 18 open-source and closed-source MLLMs, and find that even the strongest model reaches only 33.7% answer accuracy. We additionally conduct step-level process evaluation to diagnose where models fail in the reasoning chain. Our datasets are released at https://huggingface.co/datasets/physelite/PhysElite.
Title:PhysElite: How Far Are LLMs from Solving Olympiad-Level Physics Problems?
Abstract:Understanding how (multimodal) large language models perform on physics problems requires benchmarks that reflect the difficulty and breadth of expert-level physical reasoning. Existing physics benchmarks remain limited in the following two important ways: (1) short of high-difficulty datasets, and (2) lack of comprehensive coverage of visual forms, knowledge points, and step-by-step solution processes. As a result, model performance on current datasets may not be fully representative of their ability to solve complex physics problems. To address these issues, we present PhysElite, a large-scale bilingual multimodal benchmark for Olympiad-level physics reasoning. PhysElite contains 11,586 Olympiad-tier problems. For each problem, we provide corresponding visual diagrams, step-by-step bilingual Chinese-English solution derivations, and the final answer. We benchmark 18 open-source and closed-source MLLMs, and find that even the strongest model reaches only 33.7% answer accuracy. We additionally conduct step-level process evaluation to diagnose where models fail in the reasoning chain. Our datasets are released at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multimedia (cs.MM); Mathematical Physics (math-ph)
arXiv:2608.25097 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.25097v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25097 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

AI Futures: Racing to Lose, A sermon
LessWrong · Sep 28, 2026