Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical bottleneck in scaling neutral-atom quantum computers by stabilizing holographic optical tweezers against phase mismatches during spatial light modulator refresh cycles. The proposed weighted-projective Gerchberg-Saxton method enables rapid hologram generation and maintains trap quality even when reconfiguring arrays with over 1,000 atoms, directly advancing the feasibility of dynamic quantum control.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Phase-Stable Hologram Updates for Large-Scale Neutral-Atom Array Reconfiguration

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2604.04600v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Dynamic holographic optical tweezers provide a programmable route to array assembly and reconfiguration essential for scalable neutral-atom quantum computation. However, phase mismatch between successive holograms can cause destructive interference during finite spatial light modulator (SLM) refresh. In this work, we analyze finite SLM refresh to establish a phase-stability criterion for prescribed trap amplitudes and develop a weighted-projective Gerchberg-Saxton (WPGS) method that efficiently approximates the corresponding phase-only complex-field optimization. Enforcing this phase constraint also reduces the number of iterations required for each update, achieving convergence within five iterations and enabling hologram generation within a few milliseconds. Numerical simulations of 2D and 3D reconfiguration involving more than $10^3$ traps, together with nonuniform-intensity interlayer transport, show that WPGS preserves endpoint intensity quality while suppressing inter-frame phase mismatch, transient intensity degradation, trap splitting, and motional heating. Similar suppression of phase mismatch and transient-intensity degradation is maintained under Gaussian SLM-plane illumination. These results establish the phase-stability criterion as a practical design principle for dynamic holographic control and scalable neutral-atom array reconfiguration.

Abstract:Dynamic holographic optical tweezers provide a programmable route to array assembly and reconfiguration essential for scalable neutral-atom quantum computation. However, phase mismatch between successive holograms can cause destructive interference during finite spatial light modulator (SLM) refresh. In this work, we analyze finite SLM refresh to establish a phase-stability criterion for prescribed trap amplitudes and develop a weighted-projective Gerchberg-Saxton (WPGS) method that efficiently approximates the corresponding phase-only complex-field optimization. Enforcing this phase constraint also reduces the number of iterations required for each update, achieving convergence within five iterations and enabling hologram generation within a few milliseconds. Numerical simulations of 2D and 3D reconfiguration involving more than $10^3$ traps, together with nonuniform-intensity interlayer transport, show that WPGS preserves endpoint intensity quality while suppressing inter-frame phase mismatch, transient intensity degradation, trap splitting, and motional heating. Similar suppression of phase mismatch and transient-intensity degradation is maintained under Gaussian SLM-plane illumination. These results establish the phase-stability criterion as a practical design principle for dynamic holographic control and scalable neutral-atom array reconfiguration.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Atomic Physics (physics.atom-ph)

arXiv:2604.04600 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2604.04600v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.04600 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage