Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research experimentally validates composite quantum gate sequences on IBM hardware that maintain high fidelity even under significant rotation-angle errors, offering a critical path toward robust error correction. The study demonstrates that specific variable-rotation protocols preserve relative phases far better than elementary rotations, directly addressing stability issues in complex quantum circuits.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Phase-Sensitive Benchmarking of Composite Quantum Gates with Chiral-Interference Circuits on Quantum Hardware

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.18137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We construct and experimentally implement compact gate-native circuits that simulate the state-transfer interference underlying three- and four-level chiral-resolution protocols. Both models are encoded in a two-qubit register, with the enantiomer-dependent sign of one of the couplings simulated by a conditional-phase operation in the four-level circuit and by the sign of a final rotation in the three-level circuit. On an IBM quantum processor, the two circuits produce the expected enantiomer-dependent output states with probabilities of nearly $98\%$. We then use these circuits as physically motivated, phase-sensitive benchmarks for composite quantum gates. We introduce rotation-angle error to the single-qubit operations and replace them by several composite gates, including B5, SK1, BB1, H5s, and X5. The comparison demonstrates that single-gate robustness does not translate to equivalent whole-circuit robustness. In particular, variable-rotation sequences do not preserve the required relative phases, making them unsuitable for error correction in circuits. By contrast, the H5s/X5 sequences maintain high target-state populations for relative errors as large as $50\%$, whereas elementary rotations reach the same threshold only for approximately $8\%$. The three-level circuit exhibits a similar enhancement and additionally reveals an error-cancellation symmetry whose protection under composite replacement is exact only when the relevant full propagators satisfy an inverse relation.

Abstract:We construct and experimentally implement compact gate-native circuits that simulate the state-transfer interference underlying three- and four-level chiral-resolution protocols. Both models are encoded in a two-qubit register, with the enantiomer-dependent sign of one of the couplings simulated by a conditional-phase operation in the four-level circuit and by the sign of a final rotation in the three-level circuit. On an IBM quantum processor, the two circuits produce the expected enantiomer-dependent output states with probabilities of nearly $98\%$. We then use these circuits as physically motivated, phase-sensitive benchmarks for composite quantum gates. We introduce rotation-angle error to the single-qubit operations and replace them by several composite gates, including B5, SK1, BB1, H5s, and X5. The comparison demonstrates that single-gate robustness does not translate to equivalent whole-circuit robustness. In particular, variable-rotation sequences do not preserve the required relative phases, making them unsuitable for error correction in circuits. By contrast, the H5s/X5 sequences maintain high target-state populations for relative errors as large as $50\%$, whereas elementary rotations reach the same threshold only for approximately $8\%$. The three-level circuit exhibits a similar enhancement and additionally reveals an error-cancellation symmetry whose protection under composite replacement is exact only when the relevant full propagators satisfy an inverse relation.

arXiv:2607.18137 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2607.18137v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18137 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words

Related coverage