Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses critical phase-drift limitations in programmable photonic processors by optimizing sequential quadrature readout strategies to minimize measurement error variance. The study derives analytical bounds and adaptive ordering rules that significantly reduce penalties compared to fixed-order methods, validated through empirical data from an eight-mode device. For readers focused on hardware scalability, these findings offer a pathway to extend coherence times in integrated optical quantum circuits without requiring simultaneous detection capabilities.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Phase-Drift Limits and Adaptive Quadrature Readout in Programmable Photonic Processors

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.02249v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Phase fluctuations between optical inputs limit programmable photonic processors because their output powers depend on coherent interference. We study the phase-drift penalty that arises when sine and cosine quadratures are measured sequentially rather than simultaneously. The analysis is motivated by measurements from an eight-mode programmable photonic processor, including 35 free-running recordings of 300 s acquired at approximately 125 samples per second per channel. These recordings provide an empirical route for estimating the phase-increment variance at a selected reconfiguration interval. The estimate is defined at the time of the second measurement. For fixed quadrature order, perturbation of the atan2 reconstruction gives $e_{C\to S}=-\delta_\tau\sin^2\phi_0+O(\delta_\tau^2)$ and $e_{S\to C}=-\delta_\tau\cos^2\phi_0+O(\delta_\tau^2)$. Writing $Q_\tau=\operatorname{Var}(\delta_\tau)$, uniform phase averaging gives the first-order drift mean-square error $3Q_\tau/8$. A phase-predicted ordering rule measures the locally less informative quadrature first and the more informative quadrature second. Its uniform first-order penalty is $(3/8-1/\pi)Q_\tau$, which is 84.9 percent below the fixed-order value. We also derive an increment-aware estimator from a local state-space model. Marginalizing the unknown phase increment increases the variance of a stale phase observation by $Q_\tau$, reducing its Fisher information from $I$ to $I/(1+IQ_\tau)$. For ideal balanced Poisson detection, the Fisher information of each quadrature equals its detected signal-photon number. This yields dimensionless architecture boundaries in spatial information and phase-increment variance. Nonlinear Monte Carlo simulations validate the perturbative laws, quantify robustness to prediction error, and compare simultaneous, fixed-order, increment-aware, and adaptive receivers under a common noise model.

Abstract:Phase fluctuations between optical inputs limit programmable photonic processors because their output powers depend on coherent interference. We study the phase-drift penalty that arises when sine and cosine quadratures are measured sequentially rather than simultaneously. The analysis is motivated by measurements from an eight-mode programmable photonic processor, including 35 free-running recordings of 300 s acquired at approximately 125 samples per second per channel. These recordings provide an empirical route for estimating the phase-increment variance at a selected reconfiguration interval. The estimate is defined at the time of the second measurement. For fixed quadrature order, perturbation of the atan2 reconstruction gives $e_{C\to S}=-\delta_\tau\sin^2\phi_0+O(\delta_\tau^2)$ and $e_{S\to C}=-\delta_\tau\cos^2\phi_0+O(\delta_\tau^2)$. Writing $Q_\tau=\operatorname{Var}(\delta_\tau)$, uniform phase averaging gives the first-order drift mean-square error $3Q_\tau/8$. A phase-predicted ordering rule measures the locally less informative quadrature first and the more informative quadrature second. Its uniform first-order penalty is $(3/8-1/\pi)Q_\tau$, which is 84.9 percent below the fixed-order value. We also derive an increment-aware estimator from a local state-space model. Marginalizing the unknown phase increment increases the variance of a stale phase observation by $Q_\tau$, reducing its Fisher information from $I$ to $I/(1+IQ_\tau)$. For ideal balanced Poisson detection, the Fisher information of each quadrature equals its detected signal-photon number. This yields dimensionless architecture boundaries in spatial information and phase-increment variance. Nonlinear Monte Carlo simulations validate the perturbative laws, quantify robustness to prediction error, and compare simultaneous, fixed-order, increment-aware, and adaptive receivers under a common noise model.

Optics (physics.optics); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

arXiv:2608.02249 [physics.optics]

(or arXiv:2608.02249v1 [physics.optics] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02249 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 331 words

Related coverage