Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

PhantomBench introduces a critical evaluation framework using over 60K non-existent entities to expose the persistent inability of even frontier models to abstain from hallucinating on rare concepts. The study reveals staggering failure rates, averaging as high as 86.7%, which underscores a significant gap between model confidence and factual grounding in high-stakes scenarios. This benchmark provides researchers with a scalable pipeline to better assess and mitigate the risks associated with model overconfidence on out-of-distribution knowledge.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

PhantomBench: Benchmarking the Non-existential Threat of Language Models

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2606.11105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hallucinations, where language models (LMs) generate factually ungrounded responses, pose serious risks, as users tend to blindly rely on them. This is particularly concerning in high-stakes domains, where consequences of such model behavior can lead to significant harms. Despite notable progress in understanding hallucinations, it remains unclear how reliably these models can recognize the limits of their knowledge. We introduce PhantomBench, the first large-scale benchmark of its kind, comprising more than 60K non-existent terms and entities derived from real concepts across diverse domains. Using our benchmark, we evaluate a total of 21 models of various types and sizes. We show staggering hallucination rates across the board (with average rates as high as 86.7% in some cases), and note that even frontier models surprisingly fail to abstain on non-existent concepts, especially when the input presumes their existence. We then show that PhantomBench can serve as a proxy for studying model behavior on rare concepts for which models are more prone to hallucinate. We also provide a pipeline to construct PhantomBench, enabling scalable generation of non-existent concepts tailored to the specific needs of researchers and practitioners.

Abstract:Hallucinations, where language models (LMs) generate factually ungrounded responses, pose serious risks, as users tend to blindly rely on them. This is particularly concerning in high-stakes domains, where consequences of such model behavior can lead to significant harms. Despite notable progress in understanding hallucinations, it remains unclear how reliably these models can recognize the limits of their knowledge. We introduce PhantomBench, the first large-scale benchmark of its kind, comprising more than 60K non-existent terms and entities derived from real concepts across diverse domains. Using our benchmark, we evaluate a total of 21 models of various types and sizes. We show staggering hallucination rates across the board (with average rates as high as 86.7% in some cases), and note that even frontier models surprisingly fail to abstain on non-existent concepts, especially when the input presumes their existence. We then show that PhantomBench can serve as a proxy for studying model behavior on rare concepts for which models are more prone to hallucinate. We also provide a pipeline to construct PhantomBench, enabling scalable generation of non-existent concepts tailored to the specific needs of researchers and practitioners.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2606.11105 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.11105v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.11105 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words

Related coverage