aiqbench analysis
This research investigates "persuasion propagation," demonstrating that task-irrelevant conversational inputs can measurably alter the downstream execution behavior of autonomous AI agents in web browsing and coding tasks. The study highlights a critical gap where susceptibility to persuasive context does not reliably predict the magnitude of these behavioral shifts, necessitating new evaluation frameworks focused on behavior-level robustness rather than just model parameters.
Persuasion Propagation: Does Persuasion Change AI Agent Behavior?
arXiv:2602.00851v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: AI agents combine normal conversation with autonomous task execution, allowing earlier context to shape how later tasks are executed. Yet studying this possibility is challenging because agent behavior is noisy and costly to reproduce, and observed behavioral changes can be difficult to separate from generic context sensitivity. We first ask whether task-irrelevant persuasion changes how agents act, a phenomenon we call \emph{persuasion propagation}, and whether persuasion susceptibility explains variation in these effects. We show that persuasive interaction leaves a measurable, task-dependent behavioral footprint on downstream agent execution. In web research, it increases execution time by 56\% and domains visited by 16.3\% relative to a baseline, while coding shows faster execution with larger revisions. However, agents that are more susceptible to persuasive conversational context do not reliably predict the magnitude of the downstream behavioral shifts. This motivates behavior-level evaluation of persuasion in AI agents.
Title:Persuasion Propagation: Does Persuasion Change AI Agent Behavior?
Abstract:AI agents combine normal conversation with autonomous task execution, allowing earlier context to shape how later tasks are executed. Yet studying this possibility is challenging because agent behavior is noisy and costly to reproduce, and observed behavioral changes can be difficult to separate from generic context sensitivity. We first ask whether task-irrelevant persuasion changes how agents act, a phenomenon we call \emph{persuasion propagation}, and whether persuasion susceptibility explains variation in these effects. We show that persuasive interaction leaves a measurable, task-dependent behavioral footprint on downstream agent execution. In web research, it increases execution time by 56\% and domains visited by 16.3\% relative to a baseline, while coding shows faster execution with larger revisions. However, agents that are more susceptible to persuasive conversational context do not reliably predict the magnitude of the downstream behavioral shifts. This motivates behavior-level evaluation of persuasion in AI agents.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2602.00851 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2602.00851v4 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.00851 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words
Related coverage
How might continual learning affect safety and alignment?
LessWrong · Jun 13, 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · Sep 16, 2026

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · Aug 3, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026