aiqbench analysis
This research introduces the Persuasion Index (PI), a modular framework designed to detect rhetorical cues essential for AI safety and combating information manipulation. By grounding its 55 sub-features in established psychological theories, the system offers a transparent, auditable method for analyzing both human and AI-mediated communication without relying on heavy black-box models. The open-source release provides researchers with a shared feature space to study how specific persuasive dimensions correlate with outcomes across diverse domains.
Persuasion Index: A Theory-Guided Framework for Persuasion Analysis
arXiv:2606.14580v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Identifying persuasive rhetorical cues is critical across domains, from detecting information manipulation and improving AI safety to advancing public health communication. We propose the Persuasion Index (PI), a taxonomy of 15 dimensions grounded in persuasion theories from psychology and communication, and one transparent implementation using 55 sub-features built from lexicons and rule-based detectors. The taxonomy is modular: individual detectors can be replaced while preserving the theoretical structure. We evaluate PI on four public datasets for English argumentative text that vary in domain, style, and outcome measures, and show that PI provides a shared feature space for interpreting rhetorical patterns associated with persuasion-related outcomes. Linear models show that PI features carry meaningful predictive signal while remaining computationally lightweight. Dimension-level analyses reveal recurring associations between PI dimensions and persuasion outcomes across datasets, while also highlighting topic- and stance-specific variation. We release PI as an open-source package and web interface for principled and auditable analysis of human and AI-mediated communication.
Abstract:Identifying persuasive rhetorical cues is critical across domains, from detecting information manipulation and improving AI safety to advancing public health communication. We propose the Persuasion Index (PI), a taxonomy of 15 dimensions grounded in persuasion theories from psychology and communication, and one transparent implementation using 55 sub-features built from lexicons and rule-based detectors. The taxonomy is modular: individual detectors can be replaced while preserving the theoretical structure. We evaluate PI on four public datasets for English argumentative text that vary in domain, style, and outcome measures, and show that PI provides a shared feature space for interpreting rhetorical patterns associated with persuasion-related outcomes. Linear models show that PI features carry meaningful predictive signal while remaining computationally lightweight. Dimension-level analyses reveal recurring associations between PI dimensions and persuasion outcomes across datasets, while also highlighting topic- and stance-specific variation. We release PI as an open-source package and web interface for principled and auditable analysis of human and AI-mediated communication.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.14580 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.14580v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14580 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words
Related coverage
Persuasion Index: A Theory-Guided Framework for Persuasion Analysis
arXiv · Jun 15, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

Hint-based CoT faithfulness evals still mostly work on Claude
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026