Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Comms

aiqbench analysis

This study provides a rigorous comparative analysis of BB84, SARG04, and BBM92 protocols within non-turbulent underwater optical channels, highlighting how water turbidity and background illumination constrain operational distances. Crucially, the research demonstrates that relying solely on QBER thresholds is insufficient for determining secret-key rates in entanglement-based systems like BBM92, where low coincidence probabilities can coexist with acceptable error rates. These findings offer essential insights for advancing practical quantum communication networks in challenging aquatic environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Performance Analysis of Underwater Quantum Key Distribution Protocols: BB84, SARG04, and BBM92

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.29513v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study compares the quantum bit error rate (QBER) performance of BB84, SARG04, and the entanglement-based BBM92 protocol in non-turbulent underwater optical channels. Clear, coastal, and turbid water types are considered under different background-illumination and receiver configurations. For BB84 and SARG04, channel attenuation and background-induced detections determine the quantum gain and QBER. For BBM92, photon loss is included through the two arm detection efficiencies, whereas the polarization state conditioned on two-photon detection is described by local depolarizing Kraus channels. The BBM92 QBER is obtained from the correlations in both measurement bases and from an exact partition of recorded events into true and false coincidences. Stochastic numerical estimates provide consistency checks of the analytical implementation. The results show that water turbidity and optical background reduce the distance below the adopted QBER threshold. They also show that a low conditional BBM92 QBER may coexist with a very small coincidence probability; therefore, the QBER-threshold distance alone does not represent a complete operational or secret-key-rate bound.

Abstract:This study compares the quantum bit error rate (QBER) performance of BB84, SARG04, and the entanglement-based BBM92 protocol in non-turbulent underwater optical channels. Clear, coastal, and turbid water types are considered under different background-illumination and receiver configurations. For BB84 and SARG04, channel attenuation and background-induced detections determine the quantum gain and QBER. For BBM92, photon loss is included through the two arm detection efficiencies, whereas the polarization state conditioned on two-photon detection is described by local depolarizing Kraus channels. The BBM92 QBER is obtained from the correlations in both measurement bases and from an exact partition of recorded events into true and false coincidences. Stochastic numerical estimates provide consistency checks of the analytical implementation. The results show that water turbidity and optical background reduce the distance below the adopted QBER threshold. They also show that a low conditional BBM92 QBER may coexist with a very small coincidence probability; therefore, the QBER-threshold distance alone does not represent a complete operational or secret-key-rate bound.

arXiv:2605.29513 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2605.29513v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29513 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage